2016 election fraud study by Axel Geijsel

in 2016 •  7 years ago 

Dear all,

I am a student from Tilburg University (The Netherlands).

Together with a friend from Stanford University, we conducted a study regarding the current Democratic primary elections.

What we found was thoroughly disheartening. We found undeniable correlative evidence that widespread election fraud has taken place in the American primaries (see file at bottom).

In this study, we performed both a between state and a within state analysis. Dividing all states based on their sensitivity to election fraud.

We found that in almost all the states where the votes can be checked, Hillary Clinton only received an average of 44% of the votes. In states where they cant be checked? 63% !!

The stronger the chance for election fraud, the higher Clinton scores in the final results. From the 23 states that were either at risk, or have received widespread attention for election fraud, almost 90% was won by Clinton!!

When looking at the states where clean elections took place, she only won 8 out of 25, which is 32%.

Our research is clear, when there are options for election fraud, Hillary Clinton will win.

The latest results in New Jersey and the current misconduct in California are just the latest on the list, which we unfortunately havent been able to add yet.

We must not let one of the most important elections in the world be degraded to a mockery of a sideshow, a theatre for the elite.

This is a disgrace to democracy, to freedom, and to the centuries of efforts the American forefathers have made to let your voices be heard!

Let your voices be heard!!

  • Axel Geijsel

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LPANsc9FzauMBxHfbrPeGVW2I_l-hwhB

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!