Shutting down the information which contradicts the mainstream

Two weeks ago I made a post about the connection between the health implications of 5G and our current situation with lots of people keeling over.

To help illustrate what I was discussing I found what I considered to be the most informative film available. It had been thoroughly researched and presented in a slightly entertaining way, avoiding the particular words which would have triggered a red flag on YouTube and likely seen it deleted immediately.

Wanting to cross reference some of her information today I checked my old post, only to find this:

Please ask yourself why sharing our perspective on something (backing it up with numerous news articles & video clips from congressional hearings which unquestionably show that 5G has undergone no safety trials) is violating YouTube's terms of service?

There is an agenda to shut down all arguments which do not belong to the mainstream voice because when the vaccine becomes available they don't want you seeing the evidence that it causes more problems than it prevents. It is no secret that if you say certain words on YouTube (coronavirus, pandemic, world health organisation, 5G & more) your film will automatically be de-monetised. Can you see how this pushes people away from these subjects, leaving only the mainstream voices to provide the so called 'facts' for us? Needless to say, Facebook, Twitter, Google & all the main players in this space are up to the same tricks.

As for the 5G thing, if it really is just a conspiracy theory, why not let us see the opposing arguments on YouTube? Especially at this time when 5G is being activated worldwide and billions of people are stuck indoors wishing they had better internet connection!

Come on people. Don't be blind.