Repliessteemitboard (66)in gridcoin • 5 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewCongratulations @dangermouse77! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years! You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others…alexcocan (46)in gridcoin • 6 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewWhere is the resteem button? Wanted to reestem your post! Great post!steemitboard (66)in gridcoin • 6 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewCongratulations @dangermouse77! You have completed the following achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : Award for the number of comments Click on the badge to…steemitboard (66)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewCongratulations @dangermouse77! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : Award for the number of comments Click on any badge to view your own…caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewI got the certificate error too. And hm ok, I was going to say sorry for the trouble, but if it's not working for anyone at all then it'll have to get fixed one way or the other! Thanks for looking…caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewStill no luck! I even tried a different e-mail and checked the spam folders. Hmmm.. has anyone else reported issues? I suppose someone could try with a dummy e-mail address to see if the problem…caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewhmm.. didn't get an e-mail. I got an error message on Any idea what might have gone wrong?caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewAh ok, I didn't read that chapter yet! If you have corresponding changes in mind for the abstract, go ahead and put those in. Otherwise, I'll look at it too. N.b. I don't want to be presumptuous…dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Review@brod explained me in detail how PoS works and gave me this wiki page to know exactly what was done after the "Breaking and Fixing Gridcoin" whitepaper referenced in the previous comment:caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewOk awesome. I went ahead and committed my changes. I hope I did it correctly. I made some fairly substantial changes to wording in some places, so review and criticism are welcome!caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewHold on. I got a little confused. I didn't have a github account to start with. I just created one (username gridcoin23). Can you give write access to that account? I plan on printing the whitepaper…caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewOk cool. I'll check it out.dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewtoday i added a reference to @brod's Gridcoin Kernel Stake v8 in the security chapterdangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Review@brod pointed in another post at this whitepaper: i am thinking on how to integrate it as it is well written. Fortunately the mentioned security issue was solved long ago.dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewtoday i increased bitcoin miner efficiency from 1W per gigahash/s to 0.5W per gigahash/s to make the estimate more inline with the official estimate and added a chapter on transaction efficiency as…caleb23 (42)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewSure! What's the best way to send my comments? I'm not set up on Github, although if that's the best way I'm sure I can figure it out.hotbit (58)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer ReviewI would completely remove eq. (1), as in my opinion it makes no sense here. In eq. (3) looks like only 1 is to power t/7 - some formatting needed, maybe (1/2) instead of 1/2 will help. 7 is 7…dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewi implemented following changes requested by @s4mmy: more page breaks and statement in chapter 4.2 about 51% attack in conflict with chapter 7.4dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewchange implemented, now gridcoin consumes much less! the reference to your steemit article is [21]dangermouse77 (46)in gridcoin • 7 years agoRE: Gridcoin Technical Whitepaper ready for Peer Reviewchange implemented, hotbit can you check it?
