Repliesezvote (1)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: Random Thread #3: Path Birds21.00% | From: @alphacore! Looking for a new project/investment?main-gi (53)in hive-135459 • 4 years agosteemCreated with Sketch.RE: The Inevitable Lifestone ThreadJust a sidenote on Gemini, I don't believe that the vanilla moveset of "3 range rook" is worth 8. Probably around the lower end of 7-8, especially as Crusader and AirElemental are basically strict…kerdonmike (48)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: The Inevitable Lifestone ThreadI don't find current Lifestone to be out of the balanced area, as you say, and it's ok for me (both using it, and facing it). With this - "bad design, because it allows players to pay morale for…main-gi (53)in hive-135459 • 4 years agosteemCreated with Sketch.RE: The Inevitable Lifestone ThreadYou are wrong about Gemini. I'm gonna copypaste my Discord message: when it costed 12, people teleported it onto row 3 and split, and this was okay because it was so OP that paying "6 army points…adamzero (50)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: The Inevitable Lifestone Threadyour new lifestone is just envy but it can be used on dead ally champions. The old lifestone is useful but not op due to the amount you can use and morale loss. Your champion version is kinda…steembots.info (69)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: The Inevitable Lifestone ThreadThis post was resteemed by @steemvote and received a 42.33% Upvote. Send 0.5 SBD or STEEM to @steemvoteboomerang (56)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: The Inevitable Lifestone ThreadThis post has received a 17.18 % upvote from @boomerang.v-56 (44)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: Random Thread #3: Path BirdsConsidering the fact that you would value waterbird at 12 this makes knight+++ seem absurdly bad in comparisonezvote (1)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: The Inevitable Lifestone Thread17.00% | From: @alphacore! Looking for a new project/investment?thegrandestine (56)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: super serious patch notes previewCEO Lab contains a few toys like: replay system prototype, test scenarios and scenarios test, random-army mirror-match vs AI Several must be omitted in 0.54 for various annoying…vro29-34k (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: [CONCLUSION] Balancing Quiz #1, and Balancing Quiz: King to QueenBTW, I wasn't talking specifically about CEO meta (except for the values, since all the numbers are relative, which forces some adherence to CEO numbers). So I'm imagining a case where you may…vro29-34k (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: [CONCLUSION] Balancing Quiz #1, and Balancing Quiz: King to QueenBehemoth's really a very RNG matchup-dependent piece with its passive, it has no effect on Tiger/Dove/SoulFlare/Princess, less effect on weak minions like Pawns, 'average' effect on…temporalbeast (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: [CONCLUSION] Balancing Quiz #1, and Balancing Quiz: King to Queenfeels about right, I vastly prefer the old Behemoth+++ (KjAD with behemoth passive) but that can easily wreck an army without jumpersvro29-34k (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: [Kong forums repost] Guides from players above 3000 rating [100 contribution prize](just a reply to let you know I saw this) -main_givro29-34k (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: Balancing Quiz #1 (K, mKaDA, mKlDA)(despite not being in the first 2, I gave you 5 RP anyway lol) -main_githegrandestine (56)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: CEO v0.54 Unit Preview - [Gluttony]in terms of code, the hardest part has been resolving the million edge cases where certain combinations of move types create new behaviors. Some examples are: moonfox +…vro29-34k (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: CEO v0.54 Unit Preview - [Gluttony]Yeah, and I don't think passives are kept unless it's an "ability passive" like Samurai or MoonFox. -main_gijavissoft (52)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: CEO v0.54 Unit Preview - [Gluttony]From the Grand's reply to Kerdon's post, it sounds like the newest move type on a square is what is kept rather than an order of priority.thegrandestine (56)in hive-135459 • 4 years agoRE: CEO v0.54 [Balance Preview]just to be clear, I think this only in terms of high level army building, but in terms of new nullification effect using transparency as part of the attack, it is probably not going to be favorable…