Repliessteemitboard (66)in philosophy • 5 years agoRE: Analytic Philosophy: Basics of Propositional Logic [Part I]Congratulations @syllogism! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 2 years! You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on…steemitboard (66)in philosophy • 6 years agoRE: Analytic Philosophy: Basics of Propositional Logic [Part I]Congratulations @syllogism! You received a personal award! Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 1 year! Click here to view your Board Support SteemitBoard's project …smyle (66)in life • 7 years agoRE: If money cannot buy happiness, can you ever be truly happy without money?los! Thank you for your response! I did not bring 'morality' to this discourse but your first argument introduced that. Like you have rightly noted, it is a matter of perspective. Not everybody…drlindathenurse (53)in bible • 7 years agoRE: Does God really say He is 100% in control? What would that look like?You raise some good questions. I appreciate your respectful attitude and apologize for not replying sooner. I have a very demanding job and rarely check my Steemit. First, I do not know you, but I…nobyeni (59)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Being Unbiased - objectivity, facts and post-truthIf you're really interested in this, and also with your logic background, you might want to read Alain Badiou's 'Logic of Worlds' which I think is a nice take on this. Although I don't agree with…nobyeni (59)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Being Unbiased - objectivity, facts and post-truthYour claims only make sense in your world. They don't make any sense (and thus are non-sensical) to those not in your world.nobyeni (59)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Being Unbiased - objectivity, facts and post-truthAlso, don't thank Nietzsche for that. Nietzsche is one of the most misunderstood and misappropriated thinkers I know of. I don't think he is to blame for what other people have done with his work.nobyeni (59)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Being Unbiased - objectivity, facts and post-truthYou can talk about them, sure. But the things you say will not make sense for those inside those other words. In that sense it is nonsense. It is non-sensical when you want to proof the truth of…nobyeni (59)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Being Unbiased - objectivity, facts and post-truthYes, logic is a very specific method of defining and coming to truths. But even logic is itself based upon some form of worldview, it is not itself outside of a worldview. The problem is, that…smyle (66)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessI am very happy to read this! You are doing great!smyle (66)in justice • 7 years agoRE: Justice and revenge are two different thingsLols! It's not! I just decided not to reply him because it is not (in my view) an 'honest' question. When people raise questions that are religious, they are a bit skeptical but have answered…samueldouglas (54)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessExcellent - I'm all about propositional logic!phaazer1 (50)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessDone, Linked to your article at the top of my last section on 'Argumentation' @phaazer1 [SquareLink] If you can Dream it, you can Steem it.samueldouglas (54)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessGreat explanation - I couldn't have put it better myself. Are you going to bust out some propositional logic any time soon?phaazer1 (50)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and Soundness@syllogism, This is very good stuff, in fact, it helps explain some of what I was posting about. Would you mind if I edit my post to refer to this one for some further explanation on Validity and…phaazer1 (50)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: The lost art of making a sound argument (and how we can do better)Thanks @syllogism, I'll check out your post as soon as I get a chance (I'm at work). I like the sound of this. I'll make a comment in your post with my thoughts after I get a chance to check it…syllogism (29)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessIf anyone is interested in a more dynamic view/explanation on arguments, feel free to check out @phaazer1's post here .furrnfluff (25)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Exploring Philosophy: Argument Analysis - Validity and SoundnessI really like this series of explanatory posts. They're very clear and to the point. Keep it up!answerswithjoe (67)in mathematics • 7 years agoRE: Why Math Might Be Complete Bullsh*tThanks for sharing all that! I should note, I just find this interesting to think about, I don't have a strong opinion on it. :)chirieleison (53)in philosophy • 7 years agoRE: Epicurus On Worrying About The FutureMany would say he is wrong, but I do believe there is some right to it if we take some time to think. And that is precisely the problem. Most people don't think; they have others think for them.
