RE: @Drakos making threat of censorship.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

@Drakos making threat of censorship.

in abuse •  7 years ago  (edited)

Then explain why you and @wackou considered my "condition" (notice of intent) as threats?

They were not conditions as I never asked nothing of you and and your cult apart from :

@Grumpycat expect in exchange from #the-alliance and it's member to stop making claims that @grumpycat targets poor people (minnows) any more than whales without evidence. @Sneaky-ninja and @Honeybeee's lazy asses with $900,000.00 account making about 1100.00 USD per day selling vote on total garbage (and sometime charities) is far from being a minnow and has been and will remain the main target.

source

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

it's member to stop making claims that @grumpycat targets poor people (minnows) any more than whales without evidence.

Doood. There was countless amounts of evidence (especially from @the-resistance). You hit people that had just started on the platform and weren't even a week old and those were a majority of who you hit. You hit them based on the bots they used which they had no knowledge you were doing. There was no warning. You took their rewards because of something someone else did. That's bad faith.

Absolutely agree !!

buttonmash.gif

Because you were threatening to flag people totally unrelated to this with a lame 72h ultimatum.

It was a courtesy to make @wackou aware of my rules of engagement before acting.

MEME2018-04-23-01-29-02.jpg

Loading...
  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment