RE: The curious case of vote investment. Vote buying, there is no problem.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The curious case of vote investment. Vote buying, there is no problem.

in abuse •  7 years ago 

Yeah, that is one of the broad problems plaguing the platform since on the surface, it relies on maintaining its value by awarding people who would highly value their own work. There is a lot of angles to look at this from, and it's no wonder this project is one of the only one's like it and still in a very experimental stage.

One of the things I was trying to get at here was that because of this speculation, the system would logically want to move toward something safer. If the work put into a post is valued and interchangeable for liquid money, as per the rules of the system, then it would make sense that the safest and best course of action concerning creators, investors, and even the blockchain is to replace as much work as possible with money you already have, leading to vote bots. Some of my logic may not be totally sound especially since I'm explicitly ignoring certain factors, but I think I have a solid point.

Thanks for reading, I appreciate it.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

No, I totally get ya…

Trying to get my platform going/followers following, is proving to be a total grind. Would I spend a few bucks to ease that along, knowing that the content speaks for itself? Totally. Would I do that in an ecosystem where everybody else is doing that, quality be damned? No way, because then I am just fighting money with money.

I'm not sure how you get around that one. Something about buying votes with bots just feels icky, and I know that's not necessarily rational. Like paying to promote your own tinder profile or something, feels kind of desperate, and antithetical to creative purity.

Way you are describing it, the whole thing might as well become "nationalised" and integrated into the platform as a formal component, hah? Maybe it would take a fair bit of that off 😉

Haha, it already is isn't it, the promoted tab lists posts which burn SBD, the more burned, the higher up. I totally should have used that as an example. I mean, it fits because it forces liquid external monetary value to be introduced and converted into "post value," value stuck in the system.

But yeah, the human aspect is what holds things together. True creativity would fight against the conclusion I reached, and it makes sense that it has too. Logically, this platform reaches a conclusion that does not fit with it's money-stripped purpose: creativity.

As for grinding on here, it's funny isn't it, I want to say just have fun. Luck is a big factor, but if you think you need to put in lots of effort, make sure that effort has some strange ethereal non-monetary value to you so its worth it regardless. Kinda goes against this post though lol.