The formula gives more of the rewards to the users that voted earlier.
RE: Whitepaper Discussion on Voting Abuse
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Whitepaper Discussion on Voting Abuse
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Not if the users voted in the first 30 minutes, or has that been removed?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is still there. If you vote within the first 30 minutes you will share part of your curation rewards with the author.
To simplify it - if you found an amazing post that didn't have anyone voting for it, and you voted for it right at the 30 minute mark, then after that a ton more people found it and voted on it and it made it to the trending page - you would get a large amount of curation rewards.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still confused as to where the extra comes from though..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
These should help :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So it's from the curators that voted later, from their 25%?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's right. Setting aside the 30 minute rule for the moment (assume all votes are >30 minutes), curation rewards are a total of 25%. Of that 25%, earlier voters get more and later voters get less (or nothing).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit