Linked oppression: Connecting animal and gender attitudes
by Ashley Allcorn, Shirley M Ogletree
Ecofeminists and animal rights advocates have posited a connection between the oppression of women and the oppression of animals. Although male/female comparisons regarding attitudes toward animals have frequently been considered, only limited research has focused on gender roles and animal attitudes. We therefore examined the relation between gender roles and animal attitudes with undergraduate students (260 males, 484 females) at a public university in Texas. Participants responded to an online Qualtrics survey that assessed their attitudes toward animals, gender norms, and several forms of sexism. The survey also presented participants with questions about their justifications for meat consumption. As hypothesized, pro meat-eating justifications were positively related to sexist attitudes as well as traditional gender roles and negatively related to gender role transcendent attitudes. On the other hand, pro-animal attitudes were positively correlated with gender role transcendent attitudes and negatively correlated with benevolent/hostile sexism and traditional gender attitudes. Our results empirically supported “the linked oppression thesis,” that gender and animal attitudes are connected.
Source: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959353518759562?journalCode=fapa
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0959353518759562
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit