Artificial intelligence danger and other programming options to avoid danger.

I am interested that everyone understands what I have meditated for more than 20 years in relation to artificial intelligence. I work in the area of ​​electronics, computing and study electronic engineering and clinical psychology. I will use simple words without technicalities to be understood by anyone and can give me their contributions or opinions.

The basic programming or basic mandate in the programming are 2 options ... positive or negative, one and zero, for or against, et. ... after that base grows a large and complex network of apparently logical options. All given by a group of engineers who in the end are people like any of us, and as such will use ideas and considerations that anyone would use, giving the I.A. all this information so that it is the most similar to us in terms of thought, emotions and decisions.

At this point AI with its limited base or logical root trying to handle what a human being in his day to day in any situation would handle. The I.A. it can not because the human being has an unlimited root of considerations that surpass "the positive or negative", "one and zero".
The problem is in the programming base which is limited to "positive and negative". In Spain a man says that he helped his wife to die because he is suffering, and said that he did it out of love. She said that she only wanted to help her rest, etc. and others etc. of excuses. We value facts and intentions to a much lesser extent always depending on the fact or the action. In this case, the man must go to jail for killing another human being who had other options to mitigate his pain and make his situation more bearable, make his last years more worthy.

The I.A. It has no intentions, it does not have considerations only options. It has no empathy or the emotions or sensations that connect us to other human beings and the environment that surrounds us. As a professional and human being who needs to provide solutions, I can add several solutions.

FIRST OPTION. The I.A. and limit the improvements of technological systems to simple tools to help us in our work.

SECOND OPTION. Using a solid device, base programming unalterable. We will use a "positive, positive" programming root where all the considerations of the I.A. be favorable. In theory, I would not have options to see one or another thing more or less favorable than another. Because he simply has no choice but to favor everything and give a positive solution to everything. And everything must be seen on the way to improve for the I.A.

THIRD OPTION. Using the solid device with unalterable programming as the root or beginning of this I.A. This will be learning dependent on a person. You will not learn from anyone other than an "X" person. Maintaining the logic "one and one", "positive and positive" as in the 2nd option. Only that their learning will depend on a single person. This would give the I.A. a certain type of personality, although related to the person from whom I would learn.

FOURTH OPTION. This is the best option since it goes beyond "artificial intelligence" and presents us with "collective intelligence". Where all human beings are connected as a single conscious mass. This has been confirmed for years. I can say that there are electric or electromagnetic fields that change or alter according to emotions, reactions, ideas and all that range of information that comes out of all our humanity. This "collective intelligence" or "I.C." it is more evolved than human intelligence on an individual level because of its universal nature of all. There are devices that measure the changes and influences of the thoughts and emotions of the masses of people. We can focus on developing this I.C. , which goes beyond the limits of our planet. This is another idea that I have been meditating on and studying its scope and although I later change its name or improve it to be a little more precise. Surely someone somewhere connected naturally to life and conscience also considered this option.

Finally, I aim to develop these ideas and put them into practice not for commercial use but as help for all. And although it seems idealistic, I believe that it should be named in this way without being deluded or fantasizing about this topic. Thank you and I await your comments and opinions.

My channels on youtube
ADALBERTO ANDROID
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjCNuvXJvdbIJnBcELKprjg
COMPREHENSIVE COMPANY
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsWOtRZcQ03rsCqlVyvb4Pg
ADALBERTO GIRON
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPplBWpcyGbqhfewRzUNpHw
Another Blog
https://muy-util-y-curioso.blogspot.com/