RE: Life Vs. Artificial Reality

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Life Vs. Artificial Reality

in ai •  7 years ago  (edited)

In the whole, perfect and complete there is no imperfection - it just is. In the false, artificial, modified imaginary AI/VR/Transhumanist made up world there is incompleteness so thus there are two, perfection or imperfection (floating independent bubbles of ignorance). You choose which side to exist in (part of the whole or not). Perfection or incomplete. Positive or negative. Harmonious or not. Modification of the whole, perfect and complete is imperfection at its best. In the universal mind all is possible and one can choose any path of existence...break the law that of the Creator or not, abide by natural law or not...Agents of the Abyss are everywhere and 'ignorance excuses no one' as the old Maxim goes, [Do as thou will...] and see the result. Pay the price for participation. And attempting to define the perfect with linguistics or numbers is just another example of imperfection or modification of the whole. One is either connected to the Source, the Creator or not. Agents of the Abyss are middle men for the other side of the coin, and those Agents are killing, destroying and manipulating all aspects of life as it is know.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

In the whole, perfect and complete there is no imperfection - it just is.

Either it is whole, perfect and complete or it is not, ergo:

In the false, artificial, modified imaginary AI/VR/Transhumanist made up world there is incompleteness so thus there are two, perfection or imperfection (floating independent bubbles of ignorance). You choose which side to exist in (part of the whole or not)

Oil and water, you cannot mix them, you cannot make Water out of Oil or Oil out of Water.

Positive or Negative, Good or Bad, it is either Whole and Perfect or it is not.

If natural law can be broken it is not Law, least Natural. If there is such a thing as imperfection in perfect creation then it is by design and therefore it is perfectly imperfection. Same coin, so what's the fuss because you cannot have a whole with ONLY one half, as long as you polarize it to fit the dichotomy you ascribe to me thinks you're missing important lessons, and therefore your picture is clearly incomplete, but then again understanding that it's either perfect or it is not, or it's either designed as intended or it is not kinda ends all the "evil agents" story.