In early 2020, south Korean players were sentenced to one year in prison for cheating with AI. In September, Kim Eun, a 13-year-old "go genius", was found guilty of AI cheating and banned from the tournament for a year after she beat South Korea's top player, Lee Yeong-ju, with only 129 hands on black.
After a series of cheating incidents were exposed, the topic of "Cheating incidents of South Korean chess players' AI emerged in an endless stream" hit a hot search, causing hot discussions on the Internet.
Some people even think that human chess is no longer useful. You can't beat AI. Today to see the South Korean chess player AI cheating incidents emerge in endlessly this hot search, could not help sigh. The most common comment I've seen is that it's a scandal and there's no sporting spirit, and I think it's very well said, that we have a long way to go, that humans have outwitted themselves with tools, and that they should be treated with the right attitude."
"Regardless of how advanced the technology is, cheating is absolutely shameful and any attempt to use intelligent means to commit crimes will be condemned," said one netizen.
"It's totally against the spirit of sportsmanship to instill only 'whatever it takes to win,'" another wrote. And an insult to the project."
What do you think about that?
Is it possible for humans to defeat AI in strategy?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit