I read a report recently about Trinity College Dublin’s decision to abandon the word ‘freshman’ in favour of the gender-neutral ‘fresh’. I was surprised that anyone could consider that necessary and saddened to see that the hysteria and fear had spread even to an institution you would expect to be more self-confident. Fortunately, at my own alma mater we were referred to simply as freshers, thus managing to avoid the horrendous psychological scarring experienced by our Trinity College counterparts.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m all in favour of respecting other people and their personal gender identities, and I care not if you are male, female or hermaphrodite, but is it really necessary to adopt this gender neutral language as the new universal norm?
Even primary schools are not exempt. Last year INTO head Peter Mullan asked that primary schools adopt uni-sex or non-gendered uniforms, along with non-gendered toilets, so that transgender children are protected; while a report by Glen, the Gay and Lesbian Equality network states that transgender students “should be permitted to wear a uniform that is consistent with their gender identity”. “For example single-sex girls’ schools may need to consider allowing trousers to be worn. Single-sex boys schools may need to consider a variation in uniform options.” I’m presuming they’re referring to skirts!
Can the trans-gender demographic in primary schools really be so significant as to warrant such action? I mean how many people is this really affecting? I would venture to suggest that class sizes and teaching resources might be of more urgent concern.
Then we have the high street chain stores clamouring to climb aboard the gender-neutral train, with the likes of Marks & Spencer making its toy labelling gender-neutral and Zara with their new 'Ungendered' section. I spent much of my teenage years dressing in men’s suits, shirts and ties and needed no special arrangement to shop in the men’s/boy’s section. That’s me in my suit second from left in the photo below.(excuse the quality, it was the early 80s).
That's not to mention that London Underground staff have been instructed no longer to use the phrase "ladies and gentleman" when greeting and making announcements to travellers. Staff will now use the greeting "good morning everyone" to ensure that all passengers feel "welcome".
But forgive my naivety. I come from a time way back in the 20th century. A simple time when we had two genders determined by chromosomes. There are differences between men and women in our brain chemistry and genetic makeup. Try as you might to redefine sex from a biological reality to a social construct, that's just a fact. Can’t we just let people identify however the hell they please with no judgment, and just leave it at that?
This post is part of a challenge proposed by @tonyr to post a work of art each day for 26 days, each corresponding to a letter of the alphabet.
Source of top image: pixabay
Second image is my own
Right. People can Call themselves whatever they like, but leave me out of your gender bender PC word games.
These PC language police would have a hell of a time in countries in latin America where almost every word has feminine and masculine identity.
It really goes to show just how safe the world in general really is these days.
We're largely not concerned with invaders, predatory animals, plagues etc. our biggest threat of agressions are the words somebody chose to use?
Freaking pathetic.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Language defines our thinking, so I support genderneutral speaking. And in the english language it's so much easier. For example in german, when you say 'you could try...' meaning someone, you use the word man. So everytime someone proposes somthing for everyone, it feels, the are only speaking about men. So I think turning freshman into freshers is a really small thing. And about the uniforms, whenever have options been bad? You don't have to wear different ones, when you don't want to. And you can still buy your clothes in what every section of the store you want, but maybe not everyone in the eighties was as brave as you and those today might find it easier to express themselves with lower huddles...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
With all due respect, perhaps allowing language to define our thinking is where the problem lies. Perhaps we should allow a bit more thinking to define our language.
I have no problem with your identifying as he, she or it. What concerns me is the bottom of the slippery slope where a person could be punished by law for mistakenly calling a spade a spade.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree that our thinking should define our speaking, but how do you think, in words, or not? But what do you mean with someone being punished by law, what does spade stand for in this example?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, I think in words, but not PC, gender-neutral words. I don't need any thought control, thanks very much.
I was referring to state control of language such as seen in the recent C-16 bill in Canada.
Calling a spade a spade means to tell it as it is, to call things what they are without beating about the bush.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I dont know the c16 bill. And pc is not about beating around the bush, it still is about being respectful with each other, in my opinion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Being an intelligent adult I believe I can be trusted to choose the correct words in a given situation. I do not need to be told what is and what is not appropriate. As I said before, I believe state control of language is a dangerous thing indeed.
Link to info on C-16 below
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-canada-passes-radical-law-forcing-gender-theory-acceptance
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Racist!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent stuff deirdyweirdy. I enjoyed that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I read a report recently about Trinity College Dublin’s decision to abandon the word ‘freshman’
If I was a parent looking for a college to send my children too.
I'd abandon THEM.
I'd strike their name from my list.
and search further for a SERIOUS institute of higher education.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I fear we are drowning in a sea of PC nonsense and gender-neutral drivel. Trinity College is the country's most prestigious third level institution, founded in 1592, and has produced some of our greatest saints, scholars and independent thinkers. What hope is there when even they have succumbed to this insanity?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
not much it appears.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it was up to the likes of me and you, we probably could but since societies norms are decided and dictated by those who stand to benefit in some as yet undeterminable way in future from public sentiment changing around this subject, I don't think there is much hope of things returning to 'normal' any time soon and since there is no-one left willing to stand up for the traditional values we once thought we had in fear of being labelled a sexist or racist or genderist or any other kind of ist, things will likely get worse before they do, eventually, get better.
We are walking into (or being dragged into) a trap that was set a long time ago and which may well end up with us having to accept any and ALL life choices that others make for themselves, seemingly of their own volition.
Another wonderful post @deirdyweirdy. Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts on the subject. :)
Excellently written also. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks a lot Tony. I couldn't have done it without you;)
I agree with you. It's the ease and speed with which we're being led into that 'trap' and in which the social norms are being altered that amazes me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think this is the point of those changes. Adding an option to a uniform or starting to use a gender-neutral word dues not sound like a big deal to me but I know it makes a difference for people struggling with gender.
Most of us might not have a personal reason to care for this stuff, but we should also notice that none of those changes are hurting anybody while they are making a huge difference for the people that are adversely affected by those issues.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have no problem with people using gender neutral words as long as they don't want to force me to do it. The problem is, where does all this lead? Government control of language? Incarceration for calling a male a male when he actually identifies as female? Let's all be free to use whatever the hell words we want without fear that someone will be triggered.
edit: and please do not give me any more votes until at least next year!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I really don't think anybody is talking about government control or incarceration. I don't think you could even be fired, fined or expelled for something like this, so I think the talking about slippery slopes is quite the overreaction. It's pretty much people (and some institutions and organizations) engaging in free speech and reaction to speech they find offensive. I see nothing wrong with that and this doesn't and can't really limit your freedom to talk about others with whatever pronouns you want. Of course, if they are unhappy with your choices, they can react, but it only gets us to the topic of free speech vs. offense.
I personally don't see it as a burden to make accommodations to use gender neutral language if possible or reasonable and the clothes thing doesn't really bother me at all. I don't see what's the problem with mixing it up in whatever way people feel like.
And if we are talking about some problematic issues with all-boy or all-girl school, I'd say that the exisence of such outdated institutions is a much bigger issue than the fact that a student in the boys' school would like to wear a skirt.
I'm sorry but I can oblige ;) When I read something I enjoy, I'm going to vote for it and it's inspiring to me that you are doing this challenge so I want to support. I can hold off on the percentages for a bit, but that's the most I'm ready to give up ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think we are on the same 'side'. I see no burden in affording to each the right to wear what he wants or say what he wants, even if that offends me.
I am fiercely pro free speech and my problem is with allowing the state to decide and propagate the language that is allowed or not allowed.
Besides, whether or not changing language can change attitudes is surely debatable
I will leave you with these 3 links.
https://nypost.com/2016/05/19/city-issues-new-guidelines-on-transgender-pronouns/
http://dailysignal.com/2017/10/06/california-can-now-jail-people-for-misusing-gender-pronouns/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5073511/Teacher-suspended-praising-pupil-using-wrong-gender.html
I'm sorry but I can oblige ;) When I read something I enjoy, I'm going to vote for it and it's inspiring to me that you are doing this challenge so I want to support. I can hold off on the percentages for a bit, but that's the most I'm ready to give up ;)
Yer a gas man! Thanks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I never really doubted we're on the same side really. Regulating how you can address somebody is a bit much, I totally agree. But we should also notice that the fines are possible only if "malicious intent" is proven and that's a hard thing to prove and a much more substantial legal burden than just using an unwanted pronoun. So to get a fine, they need to prove that you used the wrong pronouns with the specific purpose of harassing the person.
In the other cases, it needs to be clear that codes of conduct that can be enforced at a particular workplace are neither law, nor government regulation and as many other things, crimes are not the only reason one could be suspended or fired.
Of course, pointing out overreactions is important, like with the links you shared here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit