A voluntarily appointed ruler would definitely contradict anarchist ideals, as anarchy and all related anarchos based words means no rulers. You are confusing anarchy with Voluntaryism, and even Voluntaryism would cease to be voluntary the first time a law was made or enforced that was not universally accepted by all of the ruled.
RE: Anarchism Exposed: Part 1 - Clarifying my stance and defining Anarchism
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Anarchism Exposed: Part 1 - Clarifying my stance and defining Anarchism