Working for a capitalist is voluntary. There is no crime, there is no oppression if you chose that. In an anarchy one could choose to work for no one or even set up a cooperative. Now i argue in a statist world working for others is not volutary we are not allowed to provide for ourselves nor transact buisness freely.
RE: Anarchism vs Anarchocapitalism vs Anarchocommunism
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Anarchism vs Anarchocapitalism vs Anarchocommunism
Hunger makes it mandatory for the largest percentage of the population.
Yes, people can exist outside the crapitalust paradigm.
No, it is not an option for the majority.
Under anarchism, if you become known as a bum you are not gonna like what happens next.
Very true, who finances the state?
Crapitalusts.
The state, as we know it, could not exist in a voluntary society.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit