Technically speaking, you're referring to a consequentialist perspective, not a utilitarian one, per se. Consequentialist is opposite of "deontological" or "duty-based" perspective. A compatibilist perspective merges the two, noting that there are no differences that cannot be reconciled under normal circumstances, and that only lifeboat circumstances contain irreconcilable differences of approach. Just my .02
RE: [STATISM] Is it Morally Wrong to Evade Taxes?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
[STATISM] Is it Morally Wrong to Evade Taxes?
I stand corrected on the use of the word utilitarian.
As for the word compatibilist (which I actually use in other context), I think the label isn't all that useful. There could be many ways to reconcile the two and an umbrella term could silence them.
Thanks for your input.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit