You start off your article claiming that articles about anarchy will not drive traffic to the site, and may drive traffic away. Instead of presenting numbers or evidence of such. You cite your feelings, which does not show anything. I feel that people would prefer to go to an uncensored site as opposed to a censored one. I just made an argument as convincing as yours.
You then make up words words like anarchos, right before you say that you're not trying to be combative. I'm not trying to be combative, but I'm going to call you a feeler. You then claim to be playing devil's advocate which means that you don't really believe what you're writing.

Some of your article says we need to do this or we need to do that. It's not clear who this we is.

The meat of your post then is an argument against anarchy, which provides no barring on your original claim. For example, horoscopes are invalid, but I see no reason why they would take away from use of steemit. Steemit is set up to make sure that the exposure that horoscopes see will be proportional to people's interest. It also is clear from your writing style that you have just read people's posts on the internet, and as such don't know what you are talking about.

I'm not being condescending, but I want to put things in terms you understand. I feel that feelers need to read more books.