RE: On Becoming an Anarchist: the Character and Contour of a Freeman

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

On Becoming an Anarchist: the Character and Contour of a Freeman

in anarchism •  8 years ago 

The picture you have painted here with words Sterlin is the only version of anarchy I can understand or accept. I am not interested in precise distinctions or classifications as much as I am in using my own intuition and instinct to navigate into higher pathways of holistic thinking and feeling. It is a beautiful picture that helps change the way we see the world together.

The harder, logical mind has its place but too much of that and it wants to micromanage every detail of life. It’s a lot like a ruling force or a government.

The creative, expressive mind is softer and lets things be as they are naturally and is often overlooked entirely. It’s a lot like anarchy.

There seams to be too much hard thinking and too little expression of emotion.

Well done sir!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Well stated, friend.

What you said matches my own perception almost identically. I certainly think in some situations logic and economics can be of use, but I believe the ecstatic feel of anarchism that we live and breathe will have more of an impact on society. Because like you said, it is this picture that helps alter our perceptions.

And besides, most anarchist philosophers are perpetually stuck in their heads and they miss the deep love that anarchism provides.

Thank you!