RE: Please Show Me The Perfect Anarchists (a follow up to my thoughts on @adamkokesh vs @larkenrose & @kafkanarchy84)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Please Show Me The Perfect Anarchists (a follow up to my thoughts on @adamkokesh vs @larkenrose & @kafkanarchy84)

in anarchy •  7 years ago 

Trying to lock up and define anarchy is a hazardous task, considering how many different kind of anarchisms are existing... All of them are claiming to be the real one, but truth is they all are, as the only common idea they all share is : no god and no master. No matter if you're left wing, right wing, pacifist or violent, the only common goal is to get rid of the people who are ruling, and to rule ourselves, all of us. For me, it's that simple. Rest is litterature.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Yep, which is why I hate labels with a passion. They can only divide us and fuel our egos.
These well known words below are really all we need to know. Freedom and law all rolled into one.


tjliberty.png

jonathan-quote.jpg

Exactly, as long as we agree on that 95% that is "no rules, no aggression, everything based on consent", the rest is just personal choice. The way I put it before was Let's Achieve Anarchy, Before We Argue About Adjectives :-)

Yes! Kenny! That’s right. And in a recent comment you agreed Adam’s plan does not live up to this 95% agreement. So which is it!?

His plan, his method. He is shooting for the same world, but with a different strategy. So, I do not support the strategy (because I disagree with it).

There is a BIG difference between not supporting, and aggrandizing yourself by shouting it down as some terrible thing.

Where does this “aggrandizing” stuff come from??? You guys are weird man.