RE: Anarchy Misunderstood

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Anarchy Misunderstood

in anarchy •  5 years ago 

If someone steals your watch and you take it back, you are not a thief.
If you imagine someone stole your watch, but you sold your watch to them, and you "take it back" you're the thief.
I'm under the impression that Bill Gates used politics to get his money, and if so, he is guilty of receiving stolen goods from the primary thief: government. Go after the real problem first, then you don't need to worry about the little guys (and yes, Bill Gates is small potatoes compared to the State).

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

So would you say that a takeover of the state and using that takeover to tax Bill Gates' stolen money would be in order?

No. To take over a criminal gang is to become the criminal gang.

The State never limits its acts to the guilty. To support the State is to advocate harming everyone just to get back at some who are guilty.

If YOU feel Bill Gates has stolen from or defrauded YOU, personally, I would support your right to go to his house (or hire someone to do so on your behalf, at your own expense) and take back the dollar amount he has taken (and possibly even a small amount of interest). Don't expect others to pay to help you if they don't believe your claims or if they don't want to. And be prepared to defend your actions in arbitration.

Lol, so how do you expect to implement your ideology? Playing Minecraft and larping online is fun and all, but let's get serious. How do you move forward?

I'm not going to implement anything. I won't violate people for their own good. Sorry. Becoming what I hate would be pointless.

And while your attempts at insults are kinda cute and all, they are so far off the mark they fall flat.

How I move forward is by living by the Zero Archation Principle-- it's apromise from me to you, and doesn't obligate you to do anything. You accept it or not. Not really my concern. It doesn't place any obligation on you, it just lets you know what to expect from me.

So what you're saying is that you don't care about anyone else but only yourself and if your actions have unintended consequences that hurt others you don't care about that because you didn't mean it?

Interesting!

I, on the other hand, want to help people avoid having members of their family die of preventable illnesses in the USA and will do my best to ensure (as well as insure) that it won't happen going forward.

Have fun living alone and writing weird blogs online, though!

Nope. Once again you've managed to come to the backward conclusion. Are you trying to get the wrong idea, or are you not as smart as I had originally assumed?

Leaving people to live their own lives as they see fit is the most humane, compassionate, and caring way to live among others. Without contest. If I didn't care about anyone but myself, I would advocate stealing their property and violating them in other ways as long as I thought it would get me ahead. As you can see, that's not what I advocate.

And I do mean what I say. Do you believe I should kill people who have done nothing but reject my offer to not violate them? Seems kind of violent to me. But that's the nature of government, isn't it.

You would "help" people not die of preventable diseases by sending armed employees of the state to murder them in their homes if they don't want your help? Because that is what you're advocating. Maybe when you grow up you'll learn to live peaceably with the rest of your species. I certainly hope so.

Universal healthcare is not having armed militias breaking down doors. You really are deranged lmfaooooo

"leaving" people doesn't work. This isn't 13,017 BCE, this is 2019 AD, you can't hit the reset button on your minecraft server.

Get real or go home. You're an idiot.