I am a communist,....

in anarchy •  8 years ago 

Yes, you did read that right, I said it, and though every bit of my education says that this is not supposed to be what I think, when I got to the end of this book, Looking Backwards, by Edward Bellamy 1888, there was no way for me to deny the facts.

The data says, crapitalism sucks.

Is there any wonder why a book that was second only to Uncle Tom's Cabin in sales, at the time, was not included in your literary class' reading list?


Why do we have #pizzagate

Because rich people can buy the children of the poor.

Why do the poor sell their children? 

Because they have to have the money to buy food from rich people and to the pay rent, also to rich people.

Any solution that leaves money as the way to exchange things will include trafficking in children, because when you have all the money you need excitement becomes more attractive than the money that you didn't work very hard to get.


I am going to excerpt a book, What is Communist Anarchism, by the dedicated anarchist, Alexander Berkman.

He was soooo outraged by the cowardly machine gunning of a blockade of the mill, by the employees, some just in their teens, in Homestead, Pennsylvania, that he decided to perform his 'attentat'.

He sacrificed most of his life, all of it was on the line when he made his move, to avenge the murder of workers that just wanted their share of the pie created by their own labors.

Why you people think that it is ok for crapitalusts to take a profit from employing you, and then to bitch slap you with a profit selling the fruit of your own creation back to you, is beyond me, but then, I have done the reading, I swallowed the red pill, that has led me to see this world in a light previously denied to me by those that controlled the information available to me.


Without further delay to your enlightenment:


Chapter 2: The Wage System

Did you ever stop to ask yourself this question: why were you born from your parents and not from some others? 

You understand, of course, what I am driving at. I mean that your consent was not asked. You were simply born; you did not have a chance to select the place of your birth or to choose your parents. It was just chance. 

So it happened that you were not born rich. Maybe your people are of the middle class; more likely, though, they belong to the workers, and so you are one of those millions, the masses, who have to work for a living. 

The man who has money can put it into some business or industry. He invests it and lives on the profits. But you have no money. You have only your ability to work, your labor power. 

There was a time when every workingman worked for himself. There were no factories then and no big industries. The laborer had his own tools and his own little workshop, and he even bought himself the raw materials he needed. He worked for himself, and he was called an artisan or craftsman. 

Then came the factory and the large workshop. Little by little they crowded out the independent workman, the artisan, because he could not make things as cheaply as the factory — he could not compete with the big manufacturer. So the artisan had to give up his little workshop and go to the factory to work. 

In the factories and large plants things are produced on a big scale. Such big-scale production is called industrialism. It has made the employers and manufacturers very rich, so that the lords of industry and commerce have accumulated much money, much capital. Therefore that system is called capitalism. We all live to-day in the capitalist system. 

In the capitalist system the workingman cannot work for himself, as in the old days. He cannot compete with the big manufacturers. So, if you are a workman, you must find an employer. You work for him; that is, you give him your labor for so and so many hours a day or week, and he pays you for it. You sell him your labor power and he pays you wages. 

In the capitalist system the whole working class sells its labor power to the employing class. The workers build factories, make machinery and tools, and produce goods. The employers keep the factories, the machinery, tools and goods for themselves as their profit. The workers get only wages. 

This arrangement is called the wage system. 

Learned men have figured out that the worker receives as his wage only about one-tenth of what he produces. The other nine-tenths are divided among the landlord, the manufacturer, the railroad company, the wholesaler, the jobber, and other middlemen. 

It means this: 

Though the workers, as a class, have built the factories, a slice of their daily labor is taken from them for the privilege of using those factories. That’s the landlord’s profit. 

Though the workers have made the tools and the machinery, another slice of their daily labor is taken from them for the privilege of using those tools and machinery. That’s the manufacturer’s profit. 

Though the workers built the railroads and are running them, another slice of their daily labor is taken from them for the transportation of the goods they make. That’s the railroad’s profit. 

And so on, including the banker who lends the manufacturer other people’s money, the wholesaler, the jobber, and other middlemen, all of whom get their slice of the worker’s toil. 

What is left then — one-tenth of the real worth of the worker’s labor-is his share, his wage. 

Can you guess now why the wise Proudhon said that the possessions of the rich are stolen property? Stolen from the producer, the worker. 

It seems strange, doesn’t it, that such a thing should be permitted? 

Yes, indeed, it is very strange; and the strangest thing of all is that the whole world looks on and doesn’t do a thing about it. Worse yet, the workers themselves don’t do anything about it. Why, most of them think that everything is all right, and that the capitalist system is good. 

It is because the workers don’t see what is happening to them. They don’t understand that they are being robbed. The rest of the world also understands very little about it, and when some honest man tries to tell them, they shout ‘anarchist!’ at him, and they shut him up or put him in prison. 

Of course, the capitalists are very much satisfied with the capitalist system. Why shouldn’t they be? They get rich by it. So you can’t expect them to say it’s no good. 

The middle classes are the helpers of the capitalists and they also live off the labor of the working class, so why should they object? Of course, here and there you will find some man or woman of the middle class stand up and speak the truth about the whole matter. But such persons are quickly silenced and cried down as “enemies of the people”, as crazy disturbers and anarchists. 

But you would think that the workers should be the first to object to the capitalist system, for it is they who are robbed and who suffer most from it. 

Yes, so it should be. But it isn’t so, which is very sad. 

The workers know that the shoe pinches somewhere. They know that they toil hard all their lives and that they get just enough to exist on, and sometimes not even enough. They see that their employers can ride about in fine automobiles and live in the greatest luxury, with their wives decked out in expensive clothes and diamonds, while the worker’s wife can hardly afford a new calico dress. So the workers seek to improve their condition by trying to get better wages. It is the same as if I woke up at night in my house and found that a burglar had collected all my things and is about to get away with them. Suppose that instead of stopping him, I should say to him: ‘Please, Mr. Burglar, leave me at least one suit of clothes so I can have something to put on’, and then thank him if he gives me back a tenth part of the things he has stolen from me. 

But I am getting ahead of my story. We shall return to the worker and see how he tries to improve his condition and how little he succeeds. Just now I want to tell you why the worker does not take the burglar by the neck and kick him out; that is, why he begs the capitalist for a little more bread or wages, and why he does not throw him off his back, altogether. 

It is because the worker, like the rest of the world, has been made to believe that everything is all right and must remain as it is; and that if a few things are not quite as they should be, then it is because ‘people are bad’, and everything will right itself in the end, anyhow. 

Just see if that is not true of yourself. At home, when you were a child, and when you asked so many questions, you were told that ‘it is right so,’ that ‘it must be so,’ that ‘God made it so,’ and that everything was all right. 

And you believed your father and mother, as they had believed their fathers and mothers, and that is why you now think just as your grandfather did. 

Later, in school, you were told the same things. You were taught that God had made the world and that all is well; that there must be rich and poor, and that you should respect the rich and be content with your lot. You were told that your country stands for justice, and that you must obey the law. The teacher, the priest, and the preacher all impressed it upon you that your life is ordained by God and that ‘His will be done.’ And when you saw a poor man dragged off to prison, they told you that he was bad because he had stolen something, and that it was a great crime. 

But neither at home, nor in school, nor anywhere else were you ever told that it is a crime for the rich man to steal the product of the worker’s labor, or that the capitalists are rich because they have possessed themselves of the wealth which labor created. 

No, you were never told that, nor did any one else ever hear it in school or church. How can you then expect the workers to know it? 

On the contrary, your mind — when you were a child and later on, too — has been stuffed so full of false ideas that when you hear the plain truth you wonder if it is really possible. 

Perhaps you can see now why the workers do not understand that the wealth they have created has been stolen from them and is being stolen every day. 

‘But the law,’ you ask, ‘the government — does it permit such robbery? Is not theft forbidden by law?’ 


IF you have made it this far, you may enjoy this short story, it is much more in line with crapitalism, and therefore, should ding your cognitive dissonance a little less,....

And Then There Were None, by Eric Russell 1951


Have a perfectly peaceful day!!

FBA


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Hi @freebornangel , I admire your integrity of thought and follow through by publishing your thoughts. Communism is an absolutist and socially fair system ... for people without desire to win. Capitalism is a system which rewards owners for taking risks and providing employment as a result. Neither system is working. The automation of labour has been overtaken by the weakness of government to succumb to the dollar backed weight of corporations. Capitalism has broken democracy. The problem with governments is that they have not installed the checks and balances to restrain corporations. The problem for corporations is that if they do not usurp the laws of the land, their directors can be sued by their shareholders. Stuck between a rock and a hard place?
Over the past two years every election as far as I know, has either retained the incumbent or moved to the right.
Extremism is being encouraged by failing jurisdictions.
Socialism is not communism.
Communism will never serve a people without suppression.
We have a dilemma.
Are we back to the lesser of two weevils?

Rule by force is the problem.
As long as the masses stand silent while the bullies have their way with us, this is what we get.

Also, the definition of communism has been hijacked by the crapitalusts,....https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-there-is-no-communism-in-russia
My proposal sells as being better than the status quo, or it fails to launch.

Keep working, stop paying.
We already do all the work, why do we allow parasites to set themselves above us?
Ahead of us in the line for food and leisure?

We have to have workers, we don't have to have dollars.
Dollars create nothing, but debt slavery, they don't put any products on the truck, nor do they create them.
They are simply a misdirection to take your mind off the real deal, crapitalism sucks.
The comfortable slave never rebels, why would s/he?
S/He is ok with the deal as it is.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Debt has replaced religion as the control on a populace, comrade! You MUST be a fan of one of my heroes, Christopher Hitchens, The Hitch.

Never heard of him, but his wikipage says he is tied into the hierarchy, his supper depends on the good will of rich people,...

he is dead, comrade

Yeah, but when he was alive he was the darling of media whales,....

Thanks for your continued support,....

Well, your friends sure won't point out your lack of clothes, just ask any emperor,..

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/emma-goldman-there-is-no-communism-in-russia

Composed and published via a computer designed, built and sold by capitalists, and transmitted over a capitalist internet service provider. All those evil capitalists, of course, are responsible for hiring and paying hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. Funny, that.

Hi! I am a content-detection robot. I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-communist-anarchism

Perhaps your human directors can teach you to recognize the link in the text that matches the link you just cited?

You're actually critiquing the existence of inequality, and claiming it wouldn't exist in a socialist system. This is deeply dishonest.

Inequality is often far more grave in centralized systems. Moreover, the religious (protestant?) fervor that communist/socialist regimes come with merely serves to create a neo-feudalism with the politburo at the top.

I'm from India, which remains today, essentially a communist state, which is simultaneously a colonial and also an apartheid state. People are kept poor, and uneducated in order for a large set of English-educated people to be on the top. For this loads of instruments of cultural-marxism are brought to bear, keeping the sheep divides, using funding from USAID and assorted daughter NGOs. Linguistic apartheid rules the day in India, where getting higher education -much like Africa- is now nay impossible without knowing the God's language, English. India will soon be the world's largest prostitute, selling itself to the highest bidder.

In a communist system, it'd be the politburo that would be deeply involved in the trade children, by the mere fact that this is the community that'd have political capital. Not much different from the current situation to be honest.

Inequality is built into crapitalism, without homeless people serving as an example for the sleeple they stop wage slaving in the mines and factories.
Just because you can go to the store and get what you need for free will not make us equal, some of us will excel, and some of us will be bums, it's just how life is.
The question is if you like the status quo.
Do you want to continue to be repressed by the thugs hired by the rich, or do you want to be free from coercion?

Do you know who Bhagat Singh is?

The question is if you like the status quo.

I don't believe a centralized bureaucracy with an economic stranglehold is good.

Just because you can go to the store and get what you need for free will not make us equal, some of us will excel, and some of us will be bums, it's just how life is.

Are you therefore claiming that making the state judge what one is "good" at is the answer. China had something similar in place; not sure if the Soviets did.

What exactly are you asking for, economically ?

Do you want to continue to be repressed by the thugs hired by the rich, or do you want to be free from coercion?

I don't fall for that family of dialetics anymore.

Do you know who Bhagat Singh is?

Indeed - he was apparently driven by Socialism; much as were S C Bose, and the Fabian politburo that has run India since.

Ironic considering that Marx himself was a racist asshat who thought British brought civilization to India's "primitive socialist" society run according to him by "superstition" and "feudalism". Not at all surprising considering his Rothschild association.

I am advocating the end of the 'state'.
I think you missed the end of rule by force aspect of the proposal.
Nobody will be forced to do things they don't want to do, even if they decide to be bums.
http://freeindia.org/biographies/freedomfighters/bhagathsingh/

I don't think that's the general understanding of communism (though, I guess that's what it means etymologically).

Calling India "free" is a joke. If you're interested in India (as opposed to the continuing colonial propaganda), you should read Dharampal.

https://archive.org/details/DharampalCollectedWritingsIn5Volumes

I got that on the reading list.
Few places in the world are not ruled by force, and therefore, are not free.
The 'communist' bolshevicks used the rhetoric of communists, but were in fact no different than any other crapitalusts and ruled by force to benefit themselves.

I dont think that All should get the same if they are totally different! Forget the communism forever!)

Hey how can a communist country function without the state? that system is to centralize, it requires "gatekeepers"

hey please forgive, I truly want to understand you guys. Any books, you could recommend?

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/624/624-h/624-h.htm
http://www.abelard.org/e-f-russell.php
Those two condense the content of many more in an easy to understand way,...