All anarchy needs to be successful is that you agree not to be a criminal.
If you operated they way the gov't operates, you would be in prison.
Why do accept that it is ok for folks to be criminals, as long as they get a gov't check for doing so?
RE: This is Rojava.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is Rojava.
I don't accept that it's OK for people to be criminals. Prison reforms should (probably) have been underway a few years ago. But there are a huge mass of people who are criminals, and of those some are out purely to make money/their own gain. Surely if you take away everything that is regulating and keeping them in balance, it will just fall apart.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You do accept that some people get to be criminals, otherwise you would be in the streets calling for hitlery to be hung, along with the fbi agents that covered for her.
The third world controls their criminals just fine without massive gov'ts.
When I was in mexico there was very little crime in the neighborhoods because everybody knew everybody and if somebody screamed the neighbors came running with machetes hoping to get to cut some body up for bad acting.
You don't want to get a bad reputation in a free society, you won't last long.
That is why so many criminals come to the united snakes, it is much easier to live as a criminal here.
Sounds like crapitalism to me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit