Ah, ok.
Yes, we should all work together to increase the benefits of working.
Ergo, keep working, stop paying.
Paying benefits the few by restricting what the many get out of the deal.
This has been quite scentifically worked out by kropotkin in 1906's Conquest of Bread.
Working and spending can be indivualistic. You could work at planting perennial fruit and saving money. Spending is also very important. You can buy a new car and destroy wealth or a used car and hopefully maintain wealth.
Money is a useful tool for valuing time and labor. You could substitute one or both for money but it very few people will work for absolutely nothing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Or, we could value work in ways that didnt make us slaves of those that have more money than us.
You neighbors will know if you underwork or overconsume.
This method places value on reputation rather than wallet size.
Seeing that wallet size can be gamed by bad acting, seems to me that reputation is a better measure of wealth creation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A lot of that slavery is on the spending side.
A lot of people overspend and give an illusion of wealth.
There are a lot of rich people who don't overconsume. I think there is a book called Millionaire Next Door.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ok, but under my proposal conspicous consumption becomes shameful, whereas a premium is given to leisure and pursuit of arts and home endeavors.
Instead of 50 or 60 hours in somebody else's shop one can spend 20 hours a week in producing for the group and the rest of the time as they deem fit.
Rather than working 40 or 50 years to make somebody else richer they work 20 or 25 to replace what they consume over their lifetime.
Im telling you, kropotkin did this math 100 years ago, before automation could make more than spinners sitting at spinning wheels, candle makers, and buggy whips obsolete, there is no need for banksters to ride herd on us like we were cattle.
But your indoctrination is to reject that notion as impossible.
Have you read Brave New World, beta? It is from 1932(?).
I can link it if you want.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds good on paper but it reminds me of the pilgrims failed experiment.
People can get by now working 20 hours a week. If they did enough sharing maybe they could get by on 10 hours a week but that would probably be pushing it.
A summary would be better. lol
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The govt breeds babies in bottles.
The slaves dont know they are slaves and love their slavery.
Drugs are freely given to those that have to function at higher levels than the gammas and epsilons.
It doesnt take long to read, and there are no shortcuts to wisdom.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Usually people pay for invitro.
I agree.
People need to get off drugs.
Wisdom can be summarized.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The contribution is approximately 20k hours over a lifetime.
How you get those hours would be up to you and the type of work you choose to do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
20,000 hours is not too bad. A husband or spouse could work 15 hours a week for 30 years and hit that. I think it's good to do some work.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If we want stuff, somebody has to build the replicators.
There will be plenty to do, no worries there.
Somebody has to man the space stations.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit