That’s your opinion, but I have an argument based on concrete, objective reality:
Without a universalizable means by which to appropriate scarce resources necessary for the sustenance of life, violent conflict is engendered. Do you agree?
RE: “Defining Voluntaryism” - No, private property is not “optional” (addressing @lukestokes)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
“Defining Voluntaryism” - No, private property is not “optional” (addressing @lukestokes)
Well that's the thing. Never came looking for an argument nor to change the opinion of others unless they want to change those opinions. 😎
There are too many factors leading to your theoretical choice to give a definitive answer and too tired to give a more robust explanation. Think my points have been made. Take 'em or leace 'em. ✌💛
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not an argument as in a “fight,” of course, but in the classic sense of discourse.
What a cop out answer. Lol. I came and said a bunch of stuff, but I’m too lazy to defend it. Okay.
Well. Have a good one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit