You're not missing any argument. Open borders is the only fully consistent libertarian stance. All arguments to the contrary appeal to potential violence, utilitarian rational or are disingenuous obfuscations of libertarian principles.
RE: Larken Rose Debates Lauren Southern on Borders at Anarchapulco 2018
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Larken Rose Debates Lauren Southern on Borders at Anarchapulco 2018
I think there is a minarchist case for closed borders. But I definitely do not think the case is applicable for there being a libertarian stance for be against sanctuary cities.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You like Sharia Law?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If people choose to live under Sharia who are you to say they cannot if they want to?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You love Sharia Law? You love to force people to not eat pork? You love to take rights from women and from homosexuals?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit