P2P is indeed not an alternative to capitalism. It's more a new kind of capitalism in which knowledge is not owned by a company but is freely available. I guess you could say that it is an alternative to neo-liberal capitalism.
Thanks for your comment!
RE: Is Steem a global common or a decentralised for-profit P2P?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Is Steem a global common or a decentralised for-profit P2P?
Capitalism is technically anathema to 'intellectual property' anyway. It cannot exist without a monopoly to enforce its overreach into the physical property of those whose property bears an imprint of this IP. It is however still fraud to copy someone else's work verbatim and claim it as your own, but that is easy to prove especially with computers and search engines, indeed we see here on Steem that anti-plagiarisation bots post when you copy too much of other people's original work from anywhere spidered by Google.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit