I started watching the NBC comedy, Parks and Recreation many years ago, before I began identifying as an anarchist. It was well before that actually; this was when I was right on the cusp of discovering libertarianism.
Like many viewers, I immediately fell in love with the character Ron Swanson. Some critics even called him the best comedy character since Seinfeld's Cosmo Kramer. Those are some bold words!
I fell into libertarianism around this time, and I was delighted to discover that my new favourite character shared my views. There aren't many anti-government characters on TV that are anything other than stereotypical conspiracy-theorist weirdos or violent thugs. Ron Swanson seemed like a breath of fresh air.
But after watching Parks and Rec many times over, I've noticed more than a few inconsistencies. Below I'm going to review a variety of moments from the show to reveal the mixed-up libertarianism of Ron Swanson.
Ron Swanson the Anarchist
In the quote above, for those who are a little slow on the uptake, "all this" refers to the government. For each of these categories, I'm just going to drop a few different quotes and try save my commentary until the of the section.
"I don't want this parks department to build any parks, because I don't believe in government. I think that all government is a waste of taxpayer money. My dream is to have the park system privatized and run entirely for profit by corporations. Like Chuck E. Cheese. They have an impeccable business model. I would rather work for Chuck E. Cheese. Everything operated by tokens. Drop in a token, go on the swing set. Drop in another token, take a walk. Drop in a token, look at a duck."
“There is only one bad word: taxes.”
In the long quote above, there are clearly some issues that any anarchist would immediately recognize. Primarily that without government, corporations would not exist. The corporation is a government-created entity. But the spirit of the quote is anarchistic: government shouldn't exist and we don't need it to carry out our ideas, individuals and groups of individuals will come up with solutions.
Ron Swanson the Libertarian*
*some of these quotes could fit into the Anarchist category, but I decided that unless a line is explicitly anarchistic, I'd file it under libertarianism. Capiche?
"Whatever happened to, 'Hey, I have some apples, would you like to buy them?'
'Yes! Thank you!'
That's as complicated as it should be to open a business in this country."
"The government should not prop up a failed business. That would be like giving food to a mortally wounded animal instead of slitting its throat and properly utilizing its meat and pelt."
"Libertarianism is all about individual liberty and should never be defined by the terms, 'liberal' or 'conservative'."
"This is your lunch. Now you should be able to do whatever you want to with this, right? If you want to eat all of it, great. If you want to throw it away in the garbage, that's your prerogative. But here I come, the government, and I get to take 40% of your lunch. And that, Lauren, is how taxes work."
"When I walked in this morning I saw that the flag was at half-mast, I thought, "All right, another bureaucrat ate it!"
"Why the government is involved in an art show is beyond me."
There were more quotes I could have dropped here, but the list was getting a little long. All of these lines are so good, and a few of them represent the first time I've ever seen libertarianism given a fair shake on a mainstream TV show. Unfortunately, Ron's good libertarianism is ruined by what comes next...
Ron Swanson the Conservative
In one episode, a former Parks Director tells Ron that marijuana should be legal. As a libertarian, Ron should agree that weed should at least be decriminalized. Instead, Ron answers like a grumpy conservative: "Sorry, I can't hear hippies."
In another situation, the government wants to replace their food carts in the parks, with food service from a local candy company called Sweetums. Ron supports this action because he loves privatization. But this isn't privatization. The government is still making the choices for what people can buy and eat in the parks, their just handing it off to a corporation. You know what that's called? A government-created monopoly. You know what Ron Swanson should say? "That sounds like the government meddling in private enterprise."
These moments reveal a Ron Swanson who isn't an anarchist or a libertarian. He's a right wing conservative who supports government actions that favour big business and legislate arbitrary moral codes.
Ron Swanson the Flag Worshiping Statist
“America: The only country that matters. If you want to experience other ‘cultures,’ use an atlas or a ham radio.”
"History began on July 4th, 1776. Everything before that was a mistake."
"This is America. You wanna live in North Korea? You can live in North Korea. I don't want to. I want to live in America!"
I don't know what to say about these quotes. They totally fly in the face of the Ron Swanson who wants to see the government crumble to the ground. Why does he love America so much? It doesn't make any sense.
Conclusion
Look, I know that the intent wasn't to write a political treatise. They were just out to make a comedy. I can understand that. But it bothers me that they don't seem to understand one of their main character's defining traits
Either the writers were just sloppy, or they simply don't really know what a libertarian is.
I still love the show and I still love Ron Swanson. But I can't help but cringe at a few of these moments.
Seth
- Is The Lego Movie libertarian? You bet it is!
- Steemit Explained! Episode 1 is out now.
- Consent Makes all the Difference.
- Submit a Meme to Anarcho-Memes for a chance to win $5 SBD!
- Ever feel like you're Biting Off More Than You Can Chew?
- Dunkirk and the Insanity of War.
These shows are all written by committee. Lots of different voices.
And lots of different pressures from producers to directors to the ultimate arbiters of all television: the advertisers. My guess is that, at some point, the folks who were funding this show wanted something a little different to come out of Swanson's mouth.
It's still one of the better show out there. But expecting consistency from television is like expecting elegance from a camel.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, a character's, well, character will change depending on whoever wrote that week's episode, or even that segment of the episode. It becomes all the more apparent in today's marathonable television culture; it's much easier to spot when a character does something inconsistent with the last episode when there's not even a commercial break in between. I have a series on DVD where, if you play the director's commentary, they actually joke about this sort of thing.
So to some of the writers, Ron is a true libertarian, whereas to others, he's more of a stereotypical MAGA type.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like your point about marathon watching. It's was easier to forget what a character is meant to be like when we saw it just once a week.
When a show is done well, it can be satisfying to see the characters change gradually and logically over time. I'm reminded of the Buffy cast.
Lately The Wife & I have been watching the first season of Star Trek Next Generation. (We saw it on Netflix and realized we'd never seen most of the episodes.) Now here's a show where it feels like the actors are just a bunch of puppets, with reactions and responses that are bewilderingly different from episode to episode.
Granted it's an older show from a different time. But we're curious to see how the show finds its stride in the later seasons which we think we remember a little better.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What you're saying is completely true. And I still love the show... I just can't help but get a little annoyed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, absolutely! And finding inconsistencies like this is an interesting view into the television process - like catching a glitch in the matrix!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This Post was Added to the Steemit Social Media Queue.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree. It's sloppy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, I know what you mean.
Sometimes a show writes the perfect character, but then they go and do something that's inspired more by the writer, than by what the character would actually do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's what it feels like. There are some lines where it really looks like the writer went out of their way to give a fair portrayal of what libertarians believe... then other times they just make him act like a closed-minded, flag-waving right-winger. So maybe there are some writers who get it and others who don't.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upvoted and also resteemed!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post got a
11.27
% upvote thanks to @sethlinson - Hail Eris !Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
An honest question: What do you accomplish by nitpicking a fictional comedy character?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What do I have to gain? My own enjoyment. I like to analyze fiction.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So its just mental masturbation? Why fiction instead of real people?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't agree that it's mental "masturbation." Is there really no benefit in exercising your brain to reason over something simply because the subject is fictional?
Even if it is just mental masturbation, it's fun. Why judge me for it?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Is there really no benefit to mental masturbation? There is just more benefit in analyzing the real world. Who is judging? Im just trying to understand.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit