That video was so painful that i checked out when the words 'millions and millions' of users will one day use steem.
I tried to go back and watch some more of it in case there was something worth hearing coming from the mouth of our hero playing his guitar, but just couldnt do it.
If you take the time to look, i have a 5 digit account number.
When i got here there were 1200 daily authors.
I have a pretty good idea of how the math works.
My seat of the pants estimates generally land in the ballpark.
At the time linear rewards were forced upon us by fiat, the community had made its response to the abuse of the n2 by the greedy whales.
Abit and smooth had put the kibosh on their sucking up all the rewards.
Those two downvoted any votes using more than 800mv.
The result of this whale experiment was great excitement among the minnows at their votes actually registering on the ui.
Those were ~10 good days.
The affected whales werent too happy, but they got with the program, for the most part.
Steem doesnt make sense as a game if the top 100 accounts are the only accounts earning from the reward pool, and they know that.
Those few whales with insatiable greed, and overbearing personalities, cried like little bitches and threatened to pull their investments.
Our weak willed leader gave in to their threats and forced linear rewards on us.
Rather than face the fact that distribution does matter, and mitigate its ill effects, those accounts were allowed to run roughshod over the pool and their greed was lost in the minnows getting their votes multiplied by 4x so that they too registered on the ui.
Linear rewards resulted in making spam profitable.
Self voting got them 100% of multiple hundred stu votes.
10 times a day, every day. It still does.
The black hat coders were quick to get on their bots and ride.
They are still in their saddles riding this community for maximum benefit for them.
Damn the consequences! Profits are to be made!
ROI rules over any other consideration!
As a community we were too young to know at the time how devastating this change would be, after all our votes did become visible.
We didnt know how small the daily reward pool payout actually is.
Well, now we know.
Not only has linear rewards made this game attractive to only the few greedy whales, their sycophants, and folks not too good at math, but those folks that are good at math stopped investing.
Not only has this been the results on steem, but the same greedy whales tanked golos.io, too.
Golos is a russian fork of steem.
Everybody that had an account on steem in Oct '16 got an account on golos.
It isnt like our hero doesnt know the truth of the situation, he just doesnt care.
He has his, he could burn this to the ground and it wouldnt impact his life in any substantial way.
He is not counting on steem for his supper.
If we want steem to succede the community is going to have to rise up and take control back from the greedy f**ks.
They like things this way, or things wouldnt be this way.
They crashed golos, and laughed.
They still get enough suckers to buy into steem's potential, but have no plans of allowing steem to moon.
For steem to reach its promised goal of abundance for all, we will have to change the hearts and minds of the greedy f**ks that took us off that path.
Thanks alot, greedy f**ks, we could be a successful blogging platform that introduces the masses to crypto, but instead you force us to play the fool to feed your fat faces.
Source of base image
Meme by FBA!
Just have to wait until Steem gets to 1 cent. Then everybody can become a whale.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep.
That might be the best way to quickly level out the distribution.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
what video are you talking about, please?
I am more interested in developing my pool of followers, but with the current reward system, it appears very challenging mow. I am also getting less pennies as time goes by.
I am considering to move to minds.com to be honest
ps: I am not very familiar with crypto terms such a "whale"
do you have a link explaining how to transfer my steem dollars to my bank account or ethereum wallet?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The way i go from crypto to fiat is with a bitpay.com card.
Blocktrades.us does the exchange.
Whales have 1k mvests or more. ~500,000sp.
The video is on ned's page.
Minds sucks harder than steem, but i was there first so i persist.
You would get more pennies if the top 100 accounts got out of the pool.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I will find you on Minds :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Message me, eh?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
funny you should say that...
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/goodbye-steemit-well-done-see-you-all-at-a-later-date
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I must resteem .. thanks for saying it like it is. @freebornangel
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your kindness.
I must be spartacus.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's a sad, sad thing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep, we could be helping more folks that really need it, but instead we buy Starbucks for folks that dont.
'Because its their stake.'
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Don't forget the power of deceptive advertising.
The whales hit youtube and other platforms hard to convince content creators that they could make serious money on SteemIt.com when the money was pretty much just self-votes, vote bots and organized voting rings.
Of course one need only read a few of the articles with huge votes to realize that there was no correlation between the quality of the post and the payout.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They also fed the big investors a bunch of shine, too.
'You can take all the money from the pool that you got the stake to take and there wont be any blowback?'
The tankening is a good way to shake out the weak hands.
Quality is subjective, but popularity is better than proof of wallet.
The n2 gives us that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Greed could kill Steem. We already see people churning out junk posts and buying big votes on them. I could see linear rewards were an issue if people could acquire lots of accounts. The old algorithm had issues too with the whales having too much sway, but this went too far the other way.
There's no perfect system and it's up to the users to decide how it goes. If the whales just go for the quick profit then we are doomed. I hope enough care to make it last and have a chance to grow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If we put a soft cap of 500mv, ~200k usd, the n2 works just fine.
It stops all the problems of linear rewards, but that isn't how stinc sold it to the early investors.
They told them that they could rape the reward pool as hard as they wanted and it would be ok.
We need to bring back the n2 and downvote everybody that abuses it.
If we had let that play out, we would have many more dolphins now.
As the middle class grows the soft cap can grow with it.
It isn't realistic to think of us having millions of daily users, the math just doesn't work that way.
Steem is what it is, and the sooner we work within it's bounds, the sooner our good thing can grow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Where were investors told that? I think they did okay anyway.
Why is it not realistic to have millions of users. Steem is just a small club with a few thousand active users now. That won't be taken seriously. It has to grow and I assumed it was intended to.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It will grow, but it may not have been intended to do more than give the earliest adopters a chance to dump to bagholders.
It's not realistic to have millions of users because a variety of reasons.
Too complicated, keys, no rewards for most folks.
Reward pool is too small to split into millions of pieces and still make a return on the time it takes to post.
If the math worked to put popular posts, and not paid posts, on trending we would stand a better chance, imo.
edit
'It's your stake to do with what you please.'
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steem is already dead ... it's game over ... run for the exits ... :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I now have the code, if good sir has the time, just saying. :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/goodbye-steemit-well-done-see-you-all-at-a-later-date
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit