Despite many of you don't know what Anonymous is, I can tell you what Anonymous is not, we are not cowards, we don't mock or laugh at somebody who is imprisoned, to mock or laugh is to spit on the face of freedom, and I've seen many people doing this under the banner of Anonymous. It is a disgrace and a shame. The clowns who laugh at the expense of others, wasting the effort of so many who fight for freedom, should be cast to hell and below.
We ask of you to be different, to think, not to write about their false achievements, as many of you have done, and written about hacking enterprises that never took place, therefore enabling these clowns to gain even more followers. I ask, when is it enough?
Do you need Anonymous so much, why don't you join us? You don't need to feed their lies in order the keep our good name relevant, and remind yourselves while half of them play pretend, the other half are imprisoned.
How one Twitter account skyrocketed in popularity by promoting fake and outdated leaks:
https://dailydot.com/debug/youranoncentral-anonymous-hacking-twitter/
I'm here to declare war on the clowns, who promote fake and outdated leaks, and who ironically don't want anybody else doing the same, and stealing their 'spotlight' by also promoting fake and outdated leaks, what a strange web we weave. The clowns who mock freedom, and while you are imprisoned, they do everything in their power to destroy the work of people who fight for your freedom.
There are many reasons, many of us do not engage in private conversations, and have given up reasoning with them in private, avoiding the risk they keep conversations, and publish them at a later date, claiming transparency. I have one question to raise, why do they keep records of conversations they have with people?
Hackers should never engage with these kind of people for their own safety, activists either.
A peculiar situation is unfolding, old partners in crime, the people behind @YourAnonCentral and @YourAnonNews are at odds with each other, due to @YourAnonNews sensual remarks and tweets to its female followers, bringing forth everything else they can dig on the history of both accounts.
The whatever legacy they think they have.
Why do they keep records of conversations, and make it public?
We know better, and upon this declaration of war, any conversations published as far back as the time of our inception will prove us right.
