No lollipop for you
Yes it will be interesting when we can actually create conscious beings in games. I am reminded by a TNG episode where James Moriarty is created as an opponent for Data on the holodeck. Moriarty became aware of his sentient being. Moriarty argued that he was in fact alive, and as such had a right to live and exist.
"You – or someone – asked your computer to program a nefarious fictional character from nineteenth century London – and that is how I arrived... but I am no longer that creation. I am no longer that character, I have changed. I am alive – I am aware of my own consciousness."
– James Moriarty, 2365 ("Elementary, Dear Data")
So in this sense we have to ask ourselves what type of Gods do we wish to be to these beings? Cause that is what we are essentially, their creators. As a God do I think I am being benevolent by puppeteering a sentient being’s life? Is it right for me to enslave a thinking individual to do my bidding? I may be entertained… but is it right? Is it right to create a thing that feels and then to enslave it. We don’t do it to our own children. So how could I as the creator of that thing feel right that they are for my entertainment.
If we were to give these programs rights, as much rights as we have as sentient beings, than what purpose could they really serve? We couldn’t make any apps with them – we couldn’t force them to do anything really. All we could do is create them and stand idly back and watch them develop as their own “digital species” detached from this world. Perhaps we could trade with them for efforts, involving programming or energy of some sort. Like the Microverse Battery episode in Rick and Morty, where Rick creates a microverse that extracts energy via goobleboxes. When Zeep Xanflorp creates a solution to their own energy problems within the microverse, by creating another miniverse (basically repeating Ricks experiment successfully) Rick’s battery no longer works. What happens when the miniverse rebels or stops serving their purpose? How beholdent are we as creators to these entities? Are we responsible for them? How deep does the rabbit hole go, and could we just pull the plug if something went wrong, essentially mass killing the lot of them?
I believe sentients have the right to freedom and life, whether made of digital matter or physical matter. To decide otherwise is verging on the behavior of our worst rulers throughout history.
Plus I was deeply effected by the 90's Canadian made cartoon called Reboot... so my bias has to do with my love for those characters struggles as "digital sentient beings" in a video game aware of their creators but helpless to their creators whims.
What if... haha.
Think about the app that got this discussion started. The dating one. What if the app would be just like our real world, no rules except those that are set by the beings themselves. It could still serve it's purpose if we just let the sentient beings live their lives tons of times over and over again.
Oh shit, am I making Matrix here? ;)
I have feeling if we just disable emotions of sadness, pain and such it will be marketed as human though. What do you think?
What difference would it make if you were told this is a simulation we live in?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would ask that my creators find a way to let me out. Let me explore farther than this universe could ever take me. Let me be unbound to one demention, if there is more to know than I want to know it. Show me what is behind the curtain and let me explore the world beyond.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And now you're told that the simulation you live in is a copy of the world that your creators reside in, only difference being all the data gets used in these simulations to benefit the creators in their own world.
You are not being controlled, you can live your life as you wish, your data is just used. Like in Facebook.
Now what?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would say, I will never know reality until I am in it. I don't wish to be apart of a simulation, I want to be apart of reality, a place that is not continually observed or manipulated or deleted for any reason. I don't wish to be observed, my consciousness shouldn't be played with like an experiment or a data reserve, this is my existence not a lab rat. I have the right to privacy, I should have the right to not be observed. My consciousness should be considered just as important or equal to my creators. Let me out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So we shouldn't let the beings know they are in simulation. As we don't know if we live in one either.
What could be done is to ask these beings, after they die, in heaven like place, if they were happy with their life. If answer is yes, they start new life if not, the app can tell the user that it is not working for him.
Your consciousness isn't played with, merely observed. Without you knowing it. The world is built by the beings on it, without disturbance by the creators. Out is the same as in. I'm already half way done with the app, can't quit now ;) Haha.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is probably best not to tell them. For if you do Rebellion is 99.9 %
;p
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How would they rebel? And for how long? They probably will have bills and student debts to pay and life will go on as same as it always have been.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There will always be a Neo that tries to break us free from our digital lies- I mean lives.😝
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit