The major conflicts that could arise during a planetary evacuation.

While watching Interstellar the other day, I could not make out anything else but wonder about some conferred suggestion which was part of the picture. Well, let’s be good up front, Interstellar stand as a below average film, it could have been a masterpiece, rather it simply winds up as an everyday Hollywood blockbuster. The feature has many problems, prime among them happen to be how they handled the “dying world” scenario. If the aforementioned circumstances do come to light, the evacuation process will not be as civilized as these brands of cinema frequently symbolize.

Nevertheless, there might or might not be such scenario in the future furthermore, be forcing the population to relinquish the world with the purpose of perseverance. However, with the weather of the world constantly getting affected due to global warming. The stated situation might not be equally nonsensical as it sounds in this post. Which left me to ponder, what could be some of the major conflicts that could arise during a planetary evacuation?

PLANET EXPLORATION PROJECT

NASA launched Kepler Space Telescope in 2009 to track down inhabitable planet in the nearby galaxy. Consequently, they have sought out hundreds of planets and still counting, while predicting that few other space research centers around the globe are also doing the same.

So far NASA has found a few planets which incorporate recommendatory condition such as Kepler-22b, Kepler-438b, and Kepler-442b, although the planetary conditions, thus far are not effectively conducive to hold a human life.

However, the debatable point is, even if NASA discovers a suitable planet. All these works will be in vain if not they commission an expedition before they start sending population.

Contradictory to films, where the narrator customarily presents a wormhole in a due time to chaperon us to our desire galaxy, in the real world people need to go the distance without succor.

Every such expedition will cost a fortune which in return will affect the economic system of the world, which will fluctuate lots of sovereign state financial affairs, henceforth resulting into some big-scaled conflict in the social club.

AVOID CONTAMINATION AND DISEASE!

Absconding earth and taking up residence on some other planet is not a child’s play as common people suppose, one needs to be aware of zillion outbreaks before taking that step. The main one is cross-planetary disease and pollution.

At any instant a space shuttle leaves this planet, scads of microbes bum a ride and enter into space or divergent planet’s atmosphere. Immediately, assume for granted a global evacuation process, with umpteen amount of bodies immigrating into an unexplored planet’s biosphere. The probability of a forward contamination (transmission of microorganism from earth to another planet) rises to billion-fold.

On the other hand, when a disease like Monkeypox and SARS break the species barrier and infect human being than visualize, the plausibility of some potentially infectious pathogen contaminating our body with an unidentified disease in an untrodden world, and with an entire planet’s population on heel, it’s a subject of time before an epidemic of incurable disease spread.

Only because the air is breathable and the planet has similar surroundings to earth, will not be well enough to hack it by definition “inhabitable”. A scientist needs to see this through before taking that giant leap for mankind's survival.

CHANGING HUMAN ANATOMY

The connection between the humans and the earth is profoundly unfathomable than people might think, the earth is a place where human came into being. In general, the scientist will agree that environment takes on a colossal gob in human development and that human is still evolving. To acclimate a certain milieu, people would physically start changing and with each passing generation that metamorphosis becomes furthermore plain.

Climate change, gravity, food these are all components of evolution. Why three major races of the world (Caucasian Race, Mongolian Race, and Negroid Race) physically look quite different from each other? It is due to their habitat and environment where they came into being.

Therefore the question is, what will occur if we situate ourselves in a different planet with its own environment? With its own gravitational pull. Be it unreasonable to comprehend that one by one human would physically evolve to adapt a certain condition? Nobody could figure out, what will a homo-sapiens being at variance terrestrial condition will evolve into? On the other hand, with a different food source and a different climate, the evolution process seems to be inevitable.

The reconditioning of human existence will not be at once, though, but finally, we will develop to accommodate that planetary condition. Which begs the question, will we remain human as we are today or evolve into some other begin entirely?

A SOCIAL DILEMMA

Social equality is one of the biggest illusion human races have produced for themselves. Social equality is a state of personal affair which includes civil rights, freedom of speech, property rights and equal access to social goods and services, and the notion is veritable.

This prerogative does apply to every single individual around the world (depending on the region exercise in a democracy, not dictatorship). Nevertheless, we are conversing in respect to a planetary evacuation, which under necessity falls into a worldwide phenomenon category.

Then, when the opportunity materialize for evacuation, will each person look upon without distinction and follow to an unbiased chance of natural selection? Even families who are dwelling on the street or will it be exclusive to the filthy rich and the working class.

It will be an awfully overprice course of action and will resort to a great deal of time and resources (fuel, food to name a few), for that reason alone it is looked upon that the evacuation process might exhibit some manner of iniquity.

However, the controversial point will be the selection process, and this is where the strife lies. The factionalism between the upper class and the lower class is always present, but there will be other cancers, such as patronizing one country’s population over another, one race over another or one religion over another for that matter.

MAN MADE WONDERS

Human existed on this earth for nearly 6 million years, the modern age human has been here since last 200,000 years and human civilization existed for 6000 years.

Since the first light of culture, mankind has achieved much, particularly in the sphere of art, literature, and architecture. From Homers “Odyssey” to Dante’s “Inferno”, from DA Vinci “Mona Lisa” to Vincent Van Gogh “Starry Night” or the large sculptures like Michelangelo’s David or Pietà to name a few.

These masterpieces have reverberated in our lives since their inception and are of inestimable value. Nevertheless, man’s greatest triumph takes place in the area of architecture. Over the course of millennia, man’s genius has produced some of the greatest wonders.

A few which we are totally familiar with, like the Taj Mahal or The Great Pyramids of Giza Plateau or the much-publicized Colosseum? These wonders suffer as a true testament of man’s attainment, wonders that have prompted a generation of architectures to destroy boundaries and think the unimaginable.

So the question is will humanity genuinely be able to pass on these achievements behind? Sure, you can hold a book, a painting or a statue, nevertheless, how would you take a 50-ton structure with you? Provided that human leaves this planet behind, do that allude to leaving these architecture feats behind as well.

If so, what kind of ramification will that lead to? For the time being no one can anticipate that, however, one aspect is, sure enough, the conflict will be glaring.

A HISTORY OF VOILENCE

Humans being has been looked upon as remarkably violent species on earth. Since 6,000 years ago till this date, every civilization has passed out their discord by virtue of brute force.

Today, I can evangelize how reprobate humans are, as things go we are not (at all), we are also broad-minded being capable of utmost benevolence. Therefore, you will always consider the flip side of the story and thereupon lies its greatest struggle.

If humans discover a wandering star that is worthy enough to accommodate our life force, it also might be accommodating enough to create one and I am not talking about wild things instead of an intelligent species much like us.

Granted that you correspond to our history, it seems to suggest we have not been trustworthy at sharing things. We are plagued with “conquering all” mindset. American, Roman and Persian, British and Mughals and innumerable others. Each one of them has protracted their supremacy by means of violence.

Even today, we thoroughly fail to live in tranquility with our own people, invariably dividing them on the rudiment of color, sexuality, and religion. Hence, the proposition of sharing a planet with some other intelligent life form is merely ludicrous.

However, as I was implying before not all humans are irrational murdering bunch, furthermore, there has been civil society who consistently team up with the minority and speak up in the confrontation of such partisanship and more often than not are as omnipotent as the subjugation.

THE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION

At this instant of time, human warfare is a high-priority issue furthermore, it could take an unbounded significance in the time to come. It is a pragmatic fragment of human society since the morning of the first civilization.

From blade to AK-47 we have always enabled ourselves with this high tech ammunition for an incursion and the following subjugation. Over the century, our weapons remodel to the furtherance and become markedly destructive such as the H-bomb (hydrogen bomb).

The question is when the time comes will we leave all of this behind?

It will be severely naïve of us to envision that politician around the world would ever agree to this, in the end, it is the golden law of ascendance “the bigger the gun, the bigger the supremacy”. A rule of thumb adequately proven by the British.

Great Britain, a comparatively low- scale nation went on to colonize a third of the world’s total land area, solely on the intensity of their advanced weapons and navy. The aforementioned order of things brings to bear in today’s world as good, except now in lieu of the navy it’s the nuclear bomb.

Every powerful nation has an interest in it, irrespective of whether they engage in communism or democracy. Point well demonstrated by Americans and Russians, the commissionaire of the nuclear arms race. Thus, nuclear bombs seem likely to be part of the evacuation operation. A notion that will not elate people in general.

POLITICS

Politics is an inescapable facet of our world. It is likewise the start point of all conflicts. All the actualized political policy or treaty that has come to pass, have invariably panned out into communal discordance, even if the purpose behind them were pure.

From Lincoln’s “Abolishing Slavery” act to Obama’s “Healthcare Reform” at no time was there a unified acknowledgment of anything. On the opposite, if the Left-wing side with this then the Right-wing falls out.

They squabble on every considerable idea, which not in the least placed on grounds but more on principle. Therefore instinctively it will be kind of absurd to visualize that each alliance will come to terms on such an all-out catastrophe without a bit dissent.

Some of the questions that could create a dispute in such a position are as mentioned beneath.

What will be the guideline used for the evacuation and the selection process?

Will the nations with higher population become to legislate or the one with the superior work rate or is it failing to class vs. masses?

Will the present-day order furthermore put forward along that other planet?

Will the causes that made the earth uninhabitable will be studied? And will the necessary steps be taken to avoid similar situations in the new world?

What will be the new social structure, believing the new home planet will own no infrastructure of any sort? In that instance, while the majority of the population is labored?

Will the government inaugurate some sort of agreement regarding the convicts and terrorist, will they be extradited to the new planet or cast off in a dying world. If so, will this action transpire as a just punishment or being inhumane?

Will it be step by step process where the infrastructure be set up before the evacuation procedure begin? In that case, will there be some pattern of priority involved from certain sectors of the society?

Who will administrate the real estate breakdown and decide how much land a particular nation should take?

FAITH!

Religion might turn out to be a high-power conflict in this sum. A planet with a 7.3 billion population, out of which approximately 90 percent is absorbed in all manner of orthodoxy, and could venture along with any and all extend to social movement after its superiority.

With millennia of religious emulation behind us, it is impractical to comprehend that the earth ruination will shake them out of empathy and make them leave this planet.

A planet where long ago Jesus walked, where Muhammad had his ministry, where Rama lived and where the Buddha delivers the sermon. A planet which is a design of divine being according to the Bible, Genesis, Torah and Quran, Bhagavad Geeta and uncounted more religious texts.

It is incomprehensible to visualize that faithful devotee will give those places which are a bridge for them between the tangible world and the divine.

Places such as the Vatican, Mecca and Medina, Haridwar and umpteen more, and lead to an undiscovered planet, free from their organized religion, which has never been a holy spot for their lord and which is a fruit of science.

SCIENCE V RELIGION

Science vs. Religion is that one aspect that could conjure up a major bloodbath in such state of personal concern. It is a worn-out battle whose bloody trail had moistened the long pages of the human history.

Though the ages the conflict between these bilateral orders have always been on an equal footing. On one hand, science has done with approximately all of the things that were once vouched by the religious people as a lordly miracle, and with excellent grounds.

On the other hand, the religious arbitration in our societal order is plainly clear-cut, for example, the chapter on evolution is still off limits in over and above fifty percent school textbook in the world.
The conflict is still at hand if one looks at it.

However, the genuine question is, how bloodthirsty this discord will develop into when the introductory situation crop up? Judging by how things pile up at present, we could count on the worst. Hence these are some of the many conflicts that could arise during a planetary evacuation. Tell me do you agree with this what conflicts do you add or subtract from this list.

This was my first article in steemit, hopefully, first of many. If you enjoy it then please comment below and let me know. If you didn't still do the same. Hopefully, I raised some valid points and it wasn't a giant waste of your time.