Even if there's a positive goal in there somewhere, at what point is an article or entire site ignored? When its 10% inaccurate? 20%? What about the other 80% or 90%? I read many inaccurate sources to glean facts not available elsewhere.
RE: Assange Keeps Warning Of A.I. Censorship, And It's Time We Started Listening
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Assange Keeps Warning Of A.I. Censorship, And It's Time We Started Listening