Aren’t all weapons used for assault? I suppose there is such a thing as a defensive weapon but being by nature a weapon when it is actually being deployed it is assaulting. It seems to me the term assault weapon is simply an invented term for propaganda. You can argue it’s exceeding a rate of fire threshold that elevates a firearm to the assault category but revolvers can be fired at up to a rate of 480 rounds per minute. A bolt action rifle is a poor self defense choice especially against multiple attackers.
Will limiting magazine capacities make us safer? Criminals don’t care so now they will have gained an advantage. What do you think?
Congratulations @fruitoftheboom! You have received a personal award!
1 Year on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard!
Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @fruitoftheboom! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Q
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit