I would say I would suggest returning to Aristotle

I would say I would suggest returning to Aristotle and Aristotelian mu teaching about the causes And how do we know He shared the reason for the formal cause of the material target acting by the causes of the material from which everything consists in acting Why did one event happen Thanks to what precedent events the science of the causal formal is also part of Well cause the target Why everything And where it moves it is in principle not solved by the means of science It always rises and in on the conscience of the scientist, but there is one more difference as it seems to me which can allow this difference to be felt Yes, moreover, to feel quite concrete. It seems to me that so, if the real thing is that he does not believe in any theory, no matter what theory, if he does not swear. Yes, we can always ask him about a simple thing that should happen to you that you give up your faith if we go to physics and ask him about it only the physicist will say that Well we should discover interactions with the speed of which is higher than the speed of light and then maybe I will give up the theory of relate the EU Whether we are talking about biologists in biology as a science in order to abandon the theory of Darwin it is necessary to find in the Cretaceous sediments somewhere very deeply complex microorganisms So where by definition they can not be