There have been some positive changes to how Bid-bots operate over the past month or so, but I still think there is room for improvement, if they wish to put the customer first that is.
Blacklists, white-listing accounts, a 3.5 day voting period, but what about adding a new feature to help users not see their 'promotion' attempt fail due to careless bidding or a fat-cat vote?
Do you want to instantly become the best Bid-bot owner? I have something to say that could make you just that.
pixabay source
First though, a bit on the recent changes, both good, and average.
Blacklisting users
There are plans afoot to create a global blacklist of accounts that are 'abusing' the bid-bots. In short, I think this will be a fruitless exercise.
The abuser will simply create a new account and buy votes until this is spotted. Ad infinitum.
White-listing users
This is better than the above, but is a constant administrative exercise. I would not fancy keeping this list up to date, but it does sound like a step in the right direction.
A Max Bid limit
This hasn't really taken off. I'm not sure why, and suspect it relates to profits.
The 3.5 day voting window
You've probably seen this guy knocking around?
But if you haven't, you are not to blame. In the same way good content is often missed (even with multiple curation teams and the awesome #stewardsofgondor), both older accounts, and certainly new accounts can be forgiven with regards to not knowing about #grumpycat's compliance policy.
Even Bid-bot owners using their own 'non-compliant' Bot missed it, isn't that right Jerry?
What is #grumpycat compliance?
Basically, if you use a Bid-bot (listed here: https://steembottracker.com/) that does not have its 'Max Post Age' set to 3.5 days, you risk a huge down-vote from @grumpycat - 'quality content' or not.
This is a method to provide more time to catch 'abusers' of the tool. Many posts and lengthy replies have been written on the subject and it's not the context of my post today.
Personally, I think the 3.5 day 'rule' is a sound move, and suggest to not risk using one of these 'non-compliant' bid-bots. As you can see, there are plenty more to choose from!
This brings me onto the main topic of this post.
Stop accepting bids that take the R.O.I. into the negative
Why are Bid-bot owners accepting bids that will return a negative R.O.I.?
We are not a cash machine
The owner will lose profit
No you are not a cash machine, at least not to the user of a Bid-bot.
It's not difficult to do some rough maths using the wallets of Bid-bots and their owners, and there certainly wouldn't be a new Bid-bot appearing each week if it wasn't profitable to run one.
They are promotion tools
Fine. So if i send 10 SBD to you and then a 100 SBD vote lands sending the R.O.I for the round to -40%, how do you think that 'promotion' exercise will turn out for me?
I could choose at this point to pick the best examples of negative R.O.I. from the link listed above, but I don't need to.
I'm confident that if you check it yourselves at the point you read this post, you'll see that the majority of the (compliant) Bid-bots returned a negative return, or lower promotion level than expected, in the previous round.
Be the best
If you want to be the best and most popular bid-bot, return bids that send the R.O.I. into the negative.
I think that that this move and the publicity around it will ensure your window is full and you will have far fewer dissatisfied customers to copy/paste the 'cash machine' reply to.
Anyone? What about as a trial?
Asher @abh12345
I'm relatively new here 2 months.. but have paid quite a bit of attention to this exact issue. I agree 100% with you about the problem and have these thoughts to share.
First, the overbidding is in many cases a matter of education, some basically don't know that they are making an automatic bad bet. Also, there is a seedy element too (with a few bots that I won't name), that stacks the deck by "rigging" the vote with large upvotes at the end.
In the beginning I used to think how unfair, but then I realized that with time these 2 issues would sort themselves out. Right now I know of multiple people that are writing and reviewing the different bots and how they play the games that are played. I also know of efforts underway to educate the users so that they understand more what the max vote value really means.
As time goes on I think the market will sort this out. The good ones that provide the mechanics to explain what is happening should prevail over the ones just out for a quick buck. The beauty of the blockchain is that everything is recorded and can be searched, and this will eventually lead to discovery.
I work in the financial markets and the same takes place in there. The more lucrative a market becomes, the better players eventually move in and take market share by offering a better service and/or rate.
I have only been doing this for 2 months and I can see a wide ranging area of opportunity for those that do it "right". And I am sure that there are many here that are far smarter and more capable so I have faith they will get this solved too.
As for a proposal for this particular post, here is one suggestion I would like to see (and I think would help very fast to solve the problem):
Every time they do their upvote, instead of sending the message:
"congratulations you have been upvoted 12.4% by @abh12345... blah blah blah",
but instead they said :
Congratulations on receiving an upvote on your post of 2.4 SBDs from @abh12345, however the vote yielded a negative ROI of -.15% because people overvoted the Max Suggested Bid. (for more information please go to our how overvoting happens link)
If this was done by any bot, they would be not only providing a service to their customers, they would also earn the respect of people like me and you. I think this is a "market solution" that can work. I know I would like to use bots that are upfront and honest and take the extra step of actually educating their users (which would lead to far less stupid mistakes by people that just don't know).
Just my 2 cents... Have a great day and thank you for everything you do!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good job! Thanks to @abh12345 you have planted 0.95 tree to save Abongphen Highland Forest in Cameroon. Help me to plant 1,000,000 trees and share my Steem Power to the others. Selfvoting is prohibited, but that should be the reason to spread the world to protect our precious environment. Check out profile of our conservation association @kedjom-keku and the founder/coordinator @martin.mikes to get more information about our conservation program. My current SP is 18373.18. Help me to plant more trees with your delegated SP.
Thanks a lot,
your @treeplanter
www.kedjom-keku.com
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is an excellent idea!
Perhaps include a link to the Bottracker too?
I think again, the reason this is not in place is due to some Bot owners not wanting it to. After all, the lack of clarity adds to revenue for them.
Thanks for the detailed reply, i'm being pushed to go and see the water as we've just arrived here in Mauritius. Have a great day, thank you!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
haha.. enjoy the waters of Mauritius ;)
and yes that is exactly why they don't do push for that solution. Confusion = money
Can you imagine how fast it would make people want to learn if they got 2 or 3 of these? Nobody likes to lose money. The sad truth is most people see the "upvote" and think they are winning when if fact they are getting churned into oblivion.
Enjoy your day too! (in fact, yours sounds more fun that mine) lol
take care!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Indeed - money for the confusers!
Cheers, we will!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This brings us back to the question of whether bid-bots should make you a profit or at least break even - or if they are merely promoting tools where you don’t loose all your money but just a bit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Break even is fine if we are paying for exposure I think?
I'm trying not to focus on the 'cash machine' aspect too much, and more about post promotion. Clearly there's not much promotion going on for everyone else in a round where someone arrives late with a huge bid?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, clearly not. Something like that is just a huge turndown.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No interest thus far from the BB owners :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly @flauwy. I think bid-bots are a great promotional tool and in that case I don't really mind going even or losing maybe 1 to 5%.
But many users pretty much demand that they make a guaranteed return of profit. But this is 1.) in crypto world never guaranteed (lost at least around 200-300 USD through the latest Crash on Post Rewards) and 2.) not how bid-bot works.
Would be the same if you'd go into a casino and ask if they could reset the game everytime you lose - but let it count when you win.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's a great idea, doubt any of the owners would want to hurt their profits or the profits of the delegators though. We can hope someone less focused on profits might be able to start a tend.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's most likely the reason it's not in place yet.
Most delegators profits are fixed (the sale takes place prior), so it's down to the Bid-bot owners to decide if they are going to (perhaps) give up a bit of profit, to improve their status in the community.
Thanks for the comment, the first that was actually relevant!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This! Thank you.
I don't have any coding experience but it shouldn't be that hard to code something like that. Heck, why not take it a step further and stop the bidding rounds when the ROI is below a certain percentage. That way, each round will always be a good investment for the bidders. No matter if they bid small or large.
That's exactly what bid bots are. For the owners. They make insane amounts of money due to people trying to get a somewhat decent ROI.
Another thing I personally would want, is a limit to 1 bid for each round. I've seen dozens of people enter $10 SBD bids 2 or 3 times in the same rounds, for 2 or 3 different articles. If a limit was in place, that made it impossible for the same author to bid more than once, this would also increase the ROI chance for everyone.
And, if we're worried about authors getting alternative accounts. Why not limit not the user of the bot but the author of the article to get votes multiple times from the same rounds.
So if there's already a bid for an article by @hitmeasap, don't allow a second or a third article by the same user. No matter who the bidders are.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hey!
Yes it's not hard to code at all and it's certainly not the reason.
Limiting to a unique bid per user doesn't really solve the issue - they are just reducing their ROI/promotion on the other posts I think. Maxing the bid per user sounds good though.
And I thought I was being cheeky! haha :D
Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, they're reducing the ROI for all the posts in the same rounds, so with 2 or more bids, you'll decrease your own ROI meanwhile you'll also affect the ROI for the other bidders too.
So even if something like that wouldn't solve issues, it should definitely help to keep the ROI at better percentages. At least that's how I see things.
Well, cheeky or not... Kind of "common sense" to me actually. They claim themselves to not be cash machines and for "promotional" use. - But where's the promotion if the users ends up with a negative ROI?
I could basically just give someone $1 SBD to flag my post at a certain percentage instead. - That's not the greatest idea when it comes to promotion. ^^
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
haha, don't say that! :D
You will always get something of an up-vote, certainly not a - vote. But yes, this amount is in the hands of the other bidders - some of which have much bigger pockets than others.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hello Asher. Thank you for pointing this out. Yes, I wish bid-bot owners take it a step further and refund bids that put the ROI in the negative.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm wondering if the argument when it comes to cash (which is surely the reason) would be, 'well it's x thousands less for me, but only a few $s for each customer'. Is that good enough for you? hmmm
Thanks for your comments @eastmael :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm looking at it from the point of view win-win (and would like to see the math as well). Will the the bid-bot owner not earn a profit if he operated like this (return excess bids)? If he earns a profit by operating with a refund-excess-bid policy, why then would he not implement such policy?
Again, I don't have any idea with the expenzes that come with operating a bid-bot and would appreciate if an owner can show us the math behind why implementing such policy will put them in the red. Or if does not put them in the red, perhaps it can provide enlightenment on such a blurry matter.
I hope I make sense. It's already 2:45am here. Lol.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm sure some Bid-bot owners have done their math, I'm less sure if they'd be willing to share their profit point though.
Greed?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I checked the comments and didn't see any owner reply. So I guess no bid-bot owner is brave enough to take the challenge I guess.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A shame. I think it would be great publicity, and believe the rounds would be filled each time with smaller bids at the end to take the last spots.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That seems like a sound way to approach the issue to me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Cheers. What chances do you give of it happening? :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The problem i view is the understanding from people that bid-bots are not there to give you a good return - that is purely what your content is for. In using a bot you should not expect to increase a return and in doing so is exactly whats causing the increase of abuse and spamming.
Using a bid bot in my eyes is merely a marketing tool, which in any other industry you would pay for. Its an opportunity to get your content noticed in trending sections. If i personally use one and manage to break even on my investment its a wonderful bonus.
If you look deeper into what @grumpycat is doing you may struggle to understand how someone can promote anti-abuse of a system, yet self upvote hundreds of dollars for 3 word comments.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If Ned can do it for 2.5k, then the cat can too. And sweetsssj is paying herself 30k a week via multiple accounts. You can choose to use your stake as you wish, even if it's not going to win any self sacrifice awards.
Agreed Bots are promotion tools, but over bidding the ROI reduces promotion....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I respect your opinion my bro, but with that ideology then anyone can rightly do anything simply because someone else is doing it.
What you're actually saying is anyone with enough power and money can do anything - which will only create a bigger gap of inequality, and destroy one of the many philosophies of steemit that makes its concept so beautiful. In reference to @ned, as CEO its a huge shame that someone with that much responsibility chose to abuse his power and engage in petty politics, and i think he has pissed off a lot of people (inc. larger stakeholders) with his actions.
From my perspective overbidding is a good thing. It will deter those who bid purely for profit as they wont be making any. Those that are willing to take a small hit to their promotional investments are backing their content and will ultimately create a larger following as their exposure increases along with their upvotes from genuine followers and similar authors. We shouldnt be looking to make money from bots, steemit is a community effort built on people's engagement.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't. I think embarassment is a pretty strange emotion. I don't really understand it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you hit the nail on the head! I would probably use voting bots more if this were the case, but it's just not worth risking the negative ROI...
when i first started on steemit i dabbled in voting bots and then cooled off for a bit and just let things unfold organically. then the tracking website came out and as i looked at the ROI i was shocked to see so much - - - -!! everywhere negative ROI! I tried a few that night and only 1 gave me a positive ROI! That's huge.
I hope some of the bot owners see your post - you are spot on!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
*** They could also STOP receiving incoming bids that will take the ROI into the negative realm. That could be another alternative.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for your comments @mountainjewel
Yes, return bid, or close the round is the idea - an ROI at 0.00 should be acceptable for both parties.
I use some bots too, but have reduced my stake for fear of being gazumped by a huge bid.
Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for talking about these innovations. For me it was very important. I hope this article will help my friends. Resteem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's great that a lot of bot owners are putting some quality standards and banning plagiarism and shit posts.
Some had upped their game though by complying with two short paragraphs and an image of a marvel character and posting 4-5 of these posts a day. They are what I call a golden shit post haha.
I'm no angel and I boost my posts as well but I am proud of my posts (well most of the time)
But I agree on the whole negative ROI. The bots should not accept anything that would make it a negative. Its not good for the owners and the clients for the long run.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes I also use some of the compliant bots with a small amount. I see it as reducing the amount that can be used on posts with little effort.
We'll see what happens - no comments so far from Bid-bot owners. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yesterday was the only day I got a upvote that i can consider profitable while using upvote bots. I sent 0.5sbd to minnowbooster and it sent me upvote worth around $3.5, it didn't work later..lol, they might be fixing something at that time? otherwise I have never seen a profit for using bots. I wonder how things are who throws large SBD to bids, I have never tried that myself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@minnowbooster is different from the bidding round bots, and could be a safer alternative. You can see the voting power and assess if it's worth a send to you.
Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Buying rewards, selling votes, buying delegation, and renting delegation do nothing to contribute content, ergo, they are reward pool rape.
The reward pool is there to build valuable content on the blockchain.
Any rewards obtained by means other than putting out 'good' content and getting voted by users is reward pool rape.
Everybody gets an opinion on that, but not their own facts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Buying/selling votes perhaps, but delegation is a key feature which has hugely helped the growth of STEEM.
Applications like dtube, dlive, utopian-io, would not be able to reward content without delegation to anywhere near the degree they can at present, and I think it's apps like these that are/will contribute to the long term growth of the Blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, I agree, delegation is a double edged weapon.
I delegate, both to authors I would like to see advance, and to spaminator.
But, the fact is, when delegation was hardforked in, my curation rewards went to near nothing.
It was made worse when folks started renting delegation, ergo, paying to play.
The rewards are going to folks willing to pay to play and not 'good' content creators as intended.
Nobody likes it when the bush/Clinton crime family makes people to pay to play, and nobody that is aware of what is happening here likes it, either.
Those apps are welcome to earn their sp the old fashioned way, the way that the less favored have to do it.
Anything else is just more reward pool rape.
I do concede that utopian supporting code creators is something that I would otherwise delegate to, but my sp is a drop in their delegation bucket, at this point.
When delegation came along it was during the time of the whale experiment.
The whale experiment made it worthwhile to be a minnow, we got to matter in the math.
Now, the rewards go to those willing to buy them from the whales, everybody else sucks hind tit.
Imo, we have poor retention rates because the newbs see happening here the same thing that happens in the broader world, the rich get richer and the poor do all the work.
I know that shortcuts are attractive to most, but they are not sustainable long term.
We have 700k accounts but only 60k find it worth their time to post and vote.
I'm guessing the average account age skews hard to the newbs' side.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
These are my delegations:
Retention rates/% have always been poor. The lack of posting by these accounts looks worse by 2nd(3/4/5/6) accounts that are used as a test, for curation, holding on to for others/yourself for a time when they may be useful. I have at least one of each of these.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, because reward pool rape makes the game attractive to the 'cool' kids, only.
Why would a newb come/stay here only to be ignored while sycophants make bank?
Is English your first language?
Can I get that in words that better convey the idea you tried to get across?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I will try.
Inactive account numbers are made to look worse by the number of 2nd (or 3rd/4th/etc) accounts people own.
I have multiple accounts, one I use to play the curation game, one I use to test the applications, a couple I hold for friends, and a couple i'm holding for when I think the account name will become relevant ( a bit like holding a domain name).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, ok, yes, I have a few myself that I set up for friends that then didn't contribute.
It's my guess that stinc, et al, created accounts to pad the numbers.
'Plenty of adoption going on here', but it was all inactive accounts.
I'm waiting for the truth to come out about insider sock puppet accounts having gamed us from the beginning.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I love your white list idea. And think it would be help to reduce abuse maximum.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@smartsteem is a white-listed Bid-bot, I think this is the only one. Cheers :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Please tell me any bid-bots that practice this, damn.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's easy. None of them :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can't really do anything because the bot owner will think short term rather than long term.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks a lot Asher for sharing in detail article about "Bid Bots," I think by using these bot no any fruurful profit recieved and promotion as well. because ROI mostly negative or minor positive due wich profit will be lost. By using these bots. just u increased your Repotation Score but walket remain empty. Yes you are right there should be policy for max bid bot user. Thanks again @abh12345. Take care.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for your comments @rabeel!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey dear Ashar @abh12345
Its really nice stuff and important blog. Thanks for update about code whereas i have not much knowledge. I read your stuff that is wonderful steeming. The best way steemian and followers achieve much experience.
My supports always to your blogs.
All the best and stay blessed
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for your comments, you too :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Never tried any bot still all good with nothing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like your proposals that real good will help the steem eco sistem to recover from abuse. I like partcalry the one returnig too big of bits or limting the hiest bits.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks, yes it's good to know what you will receive.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think, that there are people, who promote context only for the bots. This is wrong. But the creation of a "black sheet" these people are really useless. For me it is still a mystery, how one post is gaining a lot of votes, and second to none! Probably need to vote and promote really interesting and good posts. Everyone chooses what pleases him.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
well the price of sbd made some huge profits for them for sure
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This article is going to help me to understand how bots actually work and yes @grumpycat is ensuring the quality work.
Thanks Asher for the valuable content ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's been on my mind for a while and so in the end I had to write it out! Thank you!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the information Man. I have confusion please let me know about the term "R.O.I"how it becomes negative ? i did not understand this point Asher.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sure. ROI is Return on Investment.
You can see this % by visiting here: https://steembottracker.com/ and by clicking on 'Details' button on the right
If you then select 'last round', you will see the ROI for this.
This is the first one I opened - a negative ROI.
I hope this helps :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you so very much Asher for clearing the confusion about ROI <3
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly what I was looking for!
Upvoted, resteemed and following!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's a beautiful idea. I support you. This helps everyone
I hope you get this Thank you dear brother @abh12345 These wonderful remarks to indicate your Ftnk and your intelligence
The fact is that he needs further adjustment and we hope that this will happen soon
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is really very useful writing for all of us @ abh12345. I've used bots, but when I send sbd and the results done by bots are very harmful. because I see sbd that I send and the results when I claim is not appropriate, and that I certainly lose as well. so for the future I try to learn first about this bot comrades.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks comrade!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Bid-Bots these days are like ' My steem power gives 0.01$ of upvote , send at least 0.1$ to bid for votes'. 😂😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@abh12345 The amount of technology to pull that off is beyond me. Half the technology we have doesn't even make any sense to me. If you told me it was powered by magic I might believe.##Upvote/Resteem###
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@abh12345 ...I enjoyed scrolling down and seeing each new part of your adventure...almost like I went on the walk with you! Keep up the great work! Beautiful photos
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow this sure seems like spam on a non-adventure article.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is actually very creative Comment. Doesn't matter that it is 1 out of 100 spun copies of the same comment, as it still sounds nearly like a love poem 😂😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You really nailed your own coffin with this comment, didn’t you? ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
An absolute shocker. 'You're 2 posts late love!' :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@abh12345 you are truly lucky man! Angelina jolie visited your post... and even made the comment how much she enjoyed this scrolling down. Wow!!! Im so amazed, and I'm jealous at the same time 😂😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
haha :)
Yes she's been a regular visitor recently, woop!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I do not really understand about Bid-bots yet, but the information you write is useful for those who already understand about it,.
thanks for the information...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steemit all the way.
Great post tnx for sharing I just upvoted.
Check out my new posts if you can plz
upvote resteem comment @gclipse
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I didn't get any thing about this bit-bot thing but as you mention the blacklisting the account.i don't think this gonna stop soon,many steemians buy votes.how exactly it is gonna be handled.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well accounts are added to a list which means their bid will not be taken.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
lots of bot out there people sending insane money out to them i sent once 6 months back and it was a scam lol i always choose the wrong
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well most I wouldn't call a scam, but results can be variable!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
interesting would need to try this out and lets see how the ROI goes
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh ahem. Thanks to you @abh12345 for writing this post. I was about to make a mistake and this bot explanation saved my effort and time. Thanks again. Will plan the whole thing with proper insight again. Kudos.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
excellent post ..loving to your blog.thanks for sharing..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the post is very bang ..
@ abh12345
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's good bot
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Which one?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very NIIIIICE, I LIKKEEEEE
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is a very nice
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Buwahahahahahaha this is very nice blank lets fill it with dots :D :D :D :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit