If bidbots were healthy for STEEM, the masses would already be here.
What do you think?
Are bidbots healthy for STEEM?
5 years ago by isnochys (66)
$0.54
- Past Payouts $0.54
- - Author $0.27
- - Curators $0.26
39 votes
- + redpalestino: $0.238 (15%)
- + busy.pay: $0.093 (1.86%)
- + mehta: $0.093 (100%)
- + astrophoto.kevin: $0.035 (25%)
- + isnochys: $0.022 (100%)
- + bearded-benjamin: $0.015 (50%)
- + enforcer48: $0.008 (15%)
- + microbot: $0.004 (100%)
- + bluerobo: $0.004 (100%)
- + drotto: $0.003 (3.13%)
- + chekohler: $0.003 (9%)
- + hatoto: $0.003 (10%)
- + obvious: $0.002 (5%)
- + delabo: $0.002 (3%)
- + millibot: $0.002 (100%)
- + hdu: $0.002 (2%)
- + minibot: $0.002 (100%)
- + nanobot: $0.001 (50%)
- + bluesniper: $0.001 (0.97%)
- + grand.strategy: $0.001 (100%)
- … and 19 more
LOL
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the ability to buy attention is done incorrectly. If you want to pay for more exposure, by all means, go ahead but it shouldn't be to turn a profit on said post. Like with tribes you can promote your post and your purchase token is burned that to me makes sense. Bid botting was just reward farming and nothing more
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 3.13 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @isnochys.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Banish the vote sellers!
When nobody chooses to break proof of brain we will know proof of brain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit