RE: Have you taken a good look at your vote today?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Have you taken a good look at your vote today?

in bigfisheating •  6 years ago 

Im at 1500 and 100% is 6.46 at ~92%.
I wish @statsmonkey would come back.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

The part that I do not understand, is the math not adding up, yet everyone still cheer leading the place, reflection of real life? Much!

Most of the cheerleaders arent here for maximum profit extractions, just the paid producers and scammers.

It is what it is and, for me, that is up quite a bit.
I won't harsh my buzz by hating on those that brown nosed or squared their way to more.
Im pretty happy, overall.

Content should be king, though it is not, I see people write 2000 words about nothing, pure nothingness, yet tag a few people and bang, $100, it is beyond a joke, and why large investors look and shake their heads at this place, plus all the bickering and infights.

Content is king, among the real people.

Imo, we need to establish a soft cap at 500mv and bring back the n2.

The n2 lets minnow votes add up to something, but without the community flagging every vote over 500mv, it lets the greedy whales take everything.

This being a fact in the math makes a soft cap desirable, at this point.
You gonna put in 200k into this mess?
Not many are.

By establishing a cap like this we give big investors a reason to spread their eggs without harming what we have.
We also make it more fair for the 10k investor, he doesn't have to worry about the out of whack distribution making him a bag holder.

I will leave the math to those that can change it, no matter what I say, that person is not me.

Yep, unless what you say happens to reach the right ears.
Dan jumped ship one day after i posted about never being free of crapitalism until you stand up and take your freedoms for yourself.
He was gone the next day.
Its in the blockchain, if anybody cares to look.

And then he set off on a trail to defraud folk apparently via money washing his own ICO. :-) His failure to prove he did not is pretty damaging to say the least.

'Everybody' said steem was a scam, and we'll be doing ok once we get rid of the scammers that latched onto dan's genius for crapitalistic reasons.
I dont know about eos, never did get a wallet.
I suspect that dissenting groups will have to build their own thing there, too.

The only person anywhere near whale status I get a large upvote from, sometimes 100%, is v4vapid, and we hardly even talk.
He likes my posts, and I like his, there is no brown nose in that, and no I am not saying you were saying that about me.

It does feel nice to be appreciated at times though, as we all know.

When I put out good content I get more votes, too.
It's not about the social with a lot of voters, it's about appealing to their voting fingers.

Keep up the quality then bro.

If i knew what that was on any specific day.

LOL I hear ya bro.