TOP 200 effective Steemit curators for the 2017.09.18

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

7482 authors published their posts during this day.

22371 accounts participated in the content curating according to information from the database.

260146 votes were made during this day.

41399,53 SBD - is the total author rewards for this day.

---

TOP-200 effective curators for September 4, 2017

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@curie	202	201	4	2382,19	5,75	64
2	@minnowbooster	238	214	4	1469,1	3,55	42,02
3	@hendrikdegrote	202	201	4	1463,7	3,54	39,32
4	@pharesim	637	583	0	283,58	0,68	22,1
5	@blocktrades	43	40	22	3286,16	7,94	17,57
6	@good-karma	690	612	1	207,26	0,5	16,95
7	@abit	65	58	20	1551,6	3,75	12,03
8	@trafalgar	116	110	10	689,88	1,67	10,14
9	@htliao	107	97	12	591,39	1,43	7,67
10	@ausbitbank	180	131	6	429,22	1,04	7,52
11	@randowhalebonus	606	299	5	176,32	0,43	7,05
12	@xeldal	238	186	5	270,87	0,65	6,73
13	@booster	194	113	3	442,31	1,07	6,68
14	@tumutanzi	101	87	10	506,06	1,22	5,88
15	@sweetsssj	72	52	13	820,11	1,98	5,7
16	@gavvet	67	59	18	568,63	1,37	4,48
17	@linuslee0216	65	54	17	576,11	1,39	4,16
18	@randowhale	237	152	2	197,54	0,48	4,01
19	@teamsteem	92	65	10	454,64	1,1	3,95
20	@timsaid	96	88	15	331,28	0,8	3,9
21	@bellyrub	125	91	5	316,13	0,76	3,84
22	@randowhale1	196	131	2	191,34	0,46	3,35
23	@redes	137	119	12	207,47	0,5	3,3
24	@randowhale0	192	123	2	190,37	0,46	3,13
25	@donkeypong	57	54	19	399,49	0,96	2,88
26	@livingfree	80	56	20	367,32	0,89	2,75
27	@kpine	36	23	35	851,23	2,06	2,62
28	@nanzo-scoop	120	72	14	257,51	0,62	2,48
29	@hr1	82	68	20	269,4	0,65	2,45
30	@minnowsupport	472	442	1	40,63	0,1	2,4
31	@ramengirl	39	36	22	479,5	1,16	2,31
32	@anwenbaumeister	202	201	4	75,03	0,18	2,02
33	@promoted	136	109	8	115,22	0,28	1,68
34	@canadian-coconut	40	32	22	387,17	0,94	1,66
35	@fyrstikken	541	467	1	26,59	0,06	1,66
36	@analisa	57	55	19	224,42	0,54	1,65
37	@nicolemoker	32	30	22	401,67	0,97	1,61
38	@newhope	90	81	13	137,25	0,33	1,49
39	@cryptoctopus	68	60	18	183,5	0,44	1,47
40	@kevinwong	80	78	19	132,86	0,32	1,39
41	@slowwalker	51	47	18	214,67	0,52	1,35
42	@joele	422	312	2	32,44	0,08	1,35
43	@arama	31	30	63	328,05	0,79	1,32
44	@ats-david	36	26	28	366,67	0,89	1,27
45	@ripperone	92	79	13	117,26	0,28	1,24
46	@wackou	40	33	30	265,05	0,64	1,17
47	@surpassinggoogle	38	37	10	201,77	0,49	1
48	@twinner	147	118	9	61,81	0,15	0,97
49	@d-pend	265	250	5	25,6	0,06	0,86
50	@alexis555	84	73	12	86,54	0,21	0,84
51	@reggaemuffin	22	21	63	295,1	0,71	0,83
52	@steemed-proxy	14	11	70	560,04	1,35	0,82
53	@stackin	194	152	5	39,95	0,1	0,81
54	@glitterfart	13	12	82	469,41	1,13	0,75
55	@snowflake	30	29	100	190,5	0,46	0,74
56	@vcelier	53	38	18	142,78	0,34	0,73
57	@freeyourmind	30	29	100	187,07	0,45	0,73
58	@someonewhoisme	30	29	100	186,66	0,45	0,72
59	@enki	167	119	5	44,93	0,11	0,71
60	@kushed	177	174	2	28,67	0,07	0,67
61	@dragonslayer109	103	87	10	56,25	0,14	0,65
62	@acidyo	20	19	21	238,38	0,58	0,61
63	@mangos	77	63	13	71,02	0,17	0,6
64	@fenghuang	19	19	100	234,74	0,57	0,6
65	@isteemit	668	599	0	7,39	0,02	0,59
66	@esteemapp	686	609	1	6,86	0,02	0,56
67	@officialfuzzy	28	21	35	196,76	0,48	0,55
68	@s4s	28	26	36	155,68	0,38	0,54
69	@hanshotfirst	68	52	12	68,95	0,17	0,48
70	@aiqabrago	52	51	23	64,45	0,16	0,44
71	@rok-sivante	34	30	98	108,64	0,26	0,44
72	@theprophet0	18	11	79	285,62	0,69	0,42
73	@oldstone	27	24	41	127,08	0,31	0,41
74	@fuzzyvest	14	13	48	229,79	0,56	0,4
75	@lafona-miner	31	31	17	87,05	0,21	0,36
76	@ace108	68	57	16	45,39	0,11	0,35
77	@msp-creativebot	98	66	10	38,7	0,09	0,34
78	@thinknzombie	296	195	7	12,65	0,03	0,33
79	@adsactly	24	16	28	147,69	0,36	0,32
80	@thisvsthis	28	25	11	96,58	0,23	0,32
81	@cheerup	134	119	3	18,73	0,05	0,3
82	@fminerten	26	25	18	90,21	0,22	0,3
83	@bobbylee	75	31	99	72,98	0,18	0,3
84	@michaeldavid	64	34	7	56,48	0,14	0,26
85	@arcange	148	119	12	15,61	0,04	0,25
86	@sandra	250	125	9	13,8	0,03	0,23
87	@feruz	687	609	1	2,84	0,01	0,23
88	@msp-lovebot	164	89	18	19,5	0,05	0,23
89	@ioc	12	10	100	175,73	0,42	0,23
90	@jason	252	127	7	12,9	0,03	0,22
91	@done	9	9	99	185,44	0,45	0,22
92	@enlil	38	34	12	49,22	0,12	0,22
93	@justtryme90	32	32	41	50,63	0,12	0,22
94	@vortac	21	17	38	91,08	0,22	0,21
95	@steemprentice	546	473	2	3,32	0,01	0,21
96	@damarth	21	21	23	71,67	0,17	0,2
97	@businesswri	316	298	5	4,99	0,01	0,2
98	@chitty	57	45	33	33,27	0,08	0,2
99	@meerkat	15	15	66	98,87	0,24	0,2
100	@thecryptofiend	60	40	17	36,07	0,09	0,19
101	@corn113	41	30	29	48,57	0,12	0,19
102	@mrwalt	116	50	12	26,71	0,06	0,18
103	@rynow	159	111	7	12,4	0,03	0,18
104	@team	77	75	10	17,66	0,04	0,18
105	@kaylinart	36	21	50	59,58	0,14	0,17
106	@oflyhigh	19	15	61	82,75	0,2	0,17
107	@grandpere	89	72	24	17,62	0,04	0,17
108	@berkah	105	79	21	14,96	0,04	0,16
109	@midnas-howler	26	20	33	60,13	0,15	0,16
110	@anu	110	68	7	17,28	0,04	0,16
111	@lukestokes	18	14	71	88,07	0,21	0,16
112	@drotto	350	314	1	3,7	0,01	0,16
113	@ezzy	37	28	30	43,64	0,11	0,16
114	@jwolf	35	28	22	41,96	0,1	0,16
115	@adol	22	12	93	94,19	0,23	0,15
116	@tradeqwik	81	46	8	24,9	0,06	0,15
117	@geoffrey	25	25	35	44,45	0,11	0,15
118	@arturomdg	44	35	20	31,26	0,08	0,15
119	@kusadasi	14	10	44	106,55	0,26	0,14
120	@steempty	26	24	18	44,63	0,11	0,14
121	@minnowhelper	83	31	7	34,14	0,08	0,14
122	@deanliu	18	14	88	77,42	0,19	0,14
123	@starkerz	17	13	71	78,75	0,19	0,14
124	@jacor	67	59	18	17,05	0,04	0,13
125	@gringalicious	32	28	26	33,5	0,08	0,13
126	@jyp	29	18	38	53,22	0,13	0,13
127	@centerlink	93	64	11	14,84	0,04	0,13
128	@bcc	12	11	99	86,47	0,21	0,13
129	@btu	12	12	99	82,36	0,2	0,13
130	@raymondspeaks	649	611	3	1,55	0	0,13
131	@firepower	32	29	41	33,49	0,08	0,13
132	@fminer05	31	29	100	33,63	0,08	0,13
133	@skt	32	20	44	48,55	0,12	0,13
134	@jrcornel	12	9	93	101,5	0,25	0,12
135	@liberosist	15	15	66	57,81	0,14	0,12
136	@penguinpablo	33	29	24	30,95	0,07	0,12
137	@knircky	14	12	97	76,49	0,18	0,12
138	@surfyogi	27	14	26	62,03	0,15	0,12
139	@nextgen622	30	24	65	38,8	0,09	0,12
140	@rea	44	28	21	31,63	0,08	0,12
141	@buildawhale	68	40	7	23,23	0,06	0,12
142	@bramd	11	9	85	103,91	0,25	0,12
143	@v4vapid	7	6	52	153,34	0,37	0,12
144	@fulltimegeek	9	8	37	115,71	0,28	0,12
145	@cornerstone	32	26	33	32,99	0,08	0,11
146	@onceuponatime	7	6	100	135,44	0,33	0,11
147	@ramires	16	14	42	57,08	0,14	0,11
148	@exyle	13	10	65	82,88	0,2	0,11
149	@cheftony	331	221	2	3,63	0,01	0,11
150	@floridasnail	83	72	14	11,7	0,03	0,11
151	@anotherjoe	92	54	6	14,24	0,03	0,1
152	@abdullar	8	7	56	102,69	0,25	0,1
153	@famunger	8	8	100	89,79	0,22	0,1
154	@ajvest	31	19	98	40,31	0,1	0,1
155	@juliank	74	39	13	19,24	0,05	0,1
156	@leomichael	33	31	24	25,19	0,06	0,1
157	@stephen.king989	477	447	1	1,61	0	0,1
158	@chromium	50	40	33	18,05	0,04	0,1
159	@planter	19	19	24	39,64	0,1	0,1
160	@btcvenom	490	423	2	1,77	0	0,1
161	@joythewanderer	61	54	33	13,62	0,03	0,1
162	@toxic	28	20	97	38,29	0,09	0,1
163	@aomura	66	43	97	16,16	0,04	0,09
164	@dyuryul	16	16	53	43,98	0,11	0,09
165	@hedge-x	26	20	100	33,74	0,08	0,09
166	@ksc	48	44	19	15,88	0,04	0,09
167	@greenjuice	65	60	13	10,85	0,03	0,09
168	@crowdfundedwhale	90	52	13	12,97	0,03	0,09
169	@timcliff	20	19	45	34,29	0,08	0,09
170	@shawnfishbit	306	296	1	2,35	0,01	0,09
171	@czechglobalhosts	12	6	71	110	0,27	0,09
172	@morning	17	16	61	41,89	0,1	0,09
173	@leesunmoo	8	7	100	83,35	0,2	0,08
174	@hebrew	12	11	99	52,27	0,13	0,08
175	@gamerveda	526	458	2	1,26	0	0,08
176	@cryptomancer	48	33	23	17,39	0,04	0,08
177	@ihashfury	280	151	3	3,82	0,01	0,08
178	@robrigo	30	29	100	21,63	0,05	0,08
179	@shaka	9	9	71	67,22	0,16	0,08
180	@steemstem	27	27	29	21,26	0,05	0,08
181	@jonny-clearwater	17	16	100	35,73	0,09	0,08
182	@boomerang	31	27	15	22,86	0,06	0,08
183	@thecryptodrive	41	20	32	30,71	0,07	0,08
184	@boatymcboatface	22	21	27	25,46	0,06	0,07
185	@whalereward	18	16	46	33,99	0,08	0,07
186	@leesongyi	46	42	31	11,84	0,03	0,07
187	@uwelang	69	44	20	11,81	0,03	0,07
188	@dan-bn	36	27	28	18,29	0,04	0,07
189	@ghana531	56	54	30	9,22	0,02	0,07
190	@abishai	213	208	9	2,46	0,01	0,07
191	@zeartul	12	10	85	49,45	0,12	0,07
192	@gindor	479	445	2	1,15	0	0,07
193	@thejohalfiles	3	3	37	163,92	0,4	0,07
194	@beoped	56	45	20	11,44	0,03	0,07
195	@pnc	88	63	10	8,81	0,02	0,07
196	@clayop	6	6	100	86,17	0,21	0,07
197	@oldtimer	16	15	26	37,18	0,09	0,07
198	@jlufer	66	45	23	11,91	0,03	0,07
199	@transisto	4	4	93	131,63	0,32	0,07
200	@flipstar	30	19	41	26,53	0,06	0,07

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.