TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2018.06.25-2018.07.01)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

14765 authors published their rewarded comments during this week.

18161 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

245565 votes were made during this week.

28936,93 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2018.06.25-2018.07.01)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@utopian-io	66	43	17	3237,76	11,19	9,43
2	@steemhunt	2002	58	1	1485,19	5,13	5,83
3	@dustsweeper	1848	385	2	50,1	0,17	1,31
4	@trafalgar	238	23	5	725,06	2,51	1,13
5	@sniffnscurry	397	61	3	270,73	0,94	1,12
6	@nathanmars	589	136	13	119,91	0,41	1,1
7	@gopaxkr	129	129	3	119,22	0,41	1,04
8	@fundition	16	13	87	1091,99	3,77	0,96
9	@czechglobalhosts	222	108	2	99	0,34	0,72
10	@surpassinggoogle	177	121	1	77,14	0,27	0,63
11	@d-pend	247	66	11	136,85	0,47	0,61
12	@cryptoctopus	1119	83	0	78,74	0,27	0,44
13	@cron	100	25	50	222,32	0,77	0,38
14	@steemjetcontests	140	39	83	132,06	0,46	0,35
15	@hebrew	117	111	12	41,79	0,14	0,31
16	@agawolf	117	34	52	135,14	0,47	0,31
17	@kusadasi	61	45	13	96,27	0,33	0,29
18	@tasteem	2021	4	0	1050,74	3,63	0,28
19	@thetruth36	109	48	48	84,66	0,29	0,28
20	@bcc	261	29	9	139,3	0,48	0,27
21	@kevinwong	86	58	6	65,07	0,22	0,26
22	@engagement	442	9	6	420,31	1,45	0,26
23	@btu	253	29	9	127,16	0,44	0,25
24	@surfyogi	145	97	7	35,07	0,12	0,23
25	@tarazkp	298	138	6	24,2	0,08	0,23
26	@ulfr	202	60	22	52,97	0,18	0,22
27	@shaka	94	53	10	54,83	0,19	0,2
28	@sharonomics	82	48	97	58,32	0,2	0,19
29	@uche-nna	78	39	55	72,66	0,25	0,19
30	@ngc	508	9	6	294,46	1,02	0,18
31	@pfunk	45	36	18	72,73	0,25	0,18
32	@blocktrades	12	2	92	1330,76	4,6	0,18
33	@weupvote	85	15	37	164,15	0,57	0,17
34	@r2cornell	128	109	12	23,49	0,08	0,17
35	@sndbox	54	40	5	58,69	0,2	0,16
36	@adm	1003	4	2	591,61	2,04	0,16
37	@jaki01	98	62	8	38,28	0,13	0,16
38	@brian.rrr	145	62	9	37,47	0,13	0,16
39	@firepower	103	63	6	35,34	0,12	0,15
40	@rivalhw	90	46	12	46,56	0,16	0,15
41	@rynow	644	172	2	12,96	0,04	0,15
42	@comedyopenmic	212	28	12	79,24	0,27	0,15
43	@bue	430	69	100	29,91	0,1	0,14
44	@goldmatters	186	75	4	27,05	0,09	0,14
45	@exyle	187	79	1	23,43	0,08	0,13
46	@steamsteem	242	36	29	51,53	0,18	0,13
47	@xemurai	255	185	14	9,36	0,03	0,12
48	@senseicat	72	32	24	53,27	0,18	0,12
49	@gentlebot	22	22	96	81,7	0,28	0,12
50	@bitcoincompany	79	22	99	76,09	0,26	0,11
51	@donkeypong	42	35	4	47,44	0,16	0,11
52	@alexbeyman	151	63	11	23,05	0,08	0,1
53	@javybar	131	50	26	27,85	0,1	0,09
54	@abusereports	361	8	8	140,99	0,49	0,08
55	@socky	56	24	28	50,78	0,18	0,08
56	@xpilar	181	58	7	19,32	0,07	0,08
57	@jesse12	58	19	90	58,8	0,2	0,08
58	@rahemanali	83	49	96	23,27	0,08	0,08
59	@double-u	85	23	50	50,49	0,17	0,08
60	@jrcornel	37	7	81	168,76	0,58	0,08
61	@hiroyamagishi	94	26	52	42,96	0,15	0,08
62	@rok-sivante	47	22	53	50,75	0,18	0,08
63	@steemjet	39	35	38	31,01	0,11	0,07
64	@tata1	55	55	83	19,34	0,07	0,07
65	@steevc	243	111	7	9,13	0,03	0,07
66	@megaspore	48	29	36	34,75	0,12	0,07
67	@stephenkendal	142	68	3	14,17	0,05	0,07
68	@ackza	200	123	6	8,13	0,03	0,07
69	@ranchorelaxo	13	1	100	1022,03	3,53	0,07
70	@adsactly	52	32	1	30,33	0,1	0,07
71	@mattclarke	126	70	26	14,87	0,05	0,07
72	@virus707	1614	3	1	323,85	1,12	0,07
73	@pharesim	88	55	0	18	0,06	0,07
74	@dragosroua	170	77	7	12,21	0,04	0,06
75	@gooddream	97	39	21	21,8	0,08	0,06
76	@oddbot	118	24	47	34,2	0,12	0,06
77	@laodr	197	74	20	11,78	0,04	0,06
78	@mehta	116	47	44	19,76	0,07	0,06
79	@thedamus	220	66	23	13,21	0,05	0,06
80	@streetstyle	87	51	9	17,85	0,06	0,06
81	@djohan	183	28	73	29,35	0,1	0,06
82	@whatsup	133	78	14	10,88	0,04	0,06
83	@nonameslefttouse	127	66	7	13,83	0,05	0,06
84	@gamer00	84	53	14	15,65	0,05	0,06
85	@thecyclist	493	9	6	94,29	0,33	0,06
86	@haejin	13	7	36	125,16	0,43	0,06
87	@cowongloball	59	23	100	36,79	0,13	0,06
88	@jeezzle	88	29	50	32,98	0,11	0,06
89	@l-s-h	64	35	40	27,4	0,09	0,06
90	@discernente	97	32	52	26,95	0,09	0,06
91	@cjsdns	115	72	3	10,29	0,04	0,05
92	@julisavio	72	11	84	62,37	0,22	0,05
93	@ctrl-alt-nwo	81	68	2	11,64	0,04	0,05
94	@cryptopie	185	68	12	11,2	0,04	0,05
95	@phoneinf	150	70	15	10,54	0,04	0,05
96	@krnel	132	69	3	10,32	0,04	0,05
97	@sjchoi	40	28	96	28,68	0,1	0,05
98	@danlupi	48	7	68	101,59	0,35	0,05
99	@pairplay	64	16	17	42,23	0,15	0,05
100	@pdtrain	326	27	99	29,19	0,1	0,05
101	@shenanigator	146	17	100	40,17	0,14	0,05
102	@deandaniel	56	21	100	25,67	0,09	0,04
103	@acidyo	36	27	2	23	0,08	0,04
104	@tytran	97	64	41	9,59	0,03	0,04
105	@adrianobalan	74	13	64	50,87	0,18	0,04
106	@abigail-dantes	65	51	5	10,65	0,04	0,04
107	@overkillcoin	141	62	13	10,38	0,04	0,04
108	@arunava	133	56	3	11,4	0,04	0,04
109	@benadam	83	48	98	13,22	0,05	0,04
110	@extrospect	36	2	98	297,72	1,03	0,04
111	@full-measure	90	15	55	39,99	0,14	0,04
112	@majes.tytyty	194	26	8	22,42	0,08	0,04
113	@balte	368	56	11	11,05	0,04	0,04
114	@dapeng	88	34	63	11,17	0,04	0,03
115	@germansailor	144	71	25	6,93	0,02	0,03
116	@spinbunny	46	3	82	159,94	0,55	0,03
117	@abh12345	128	76	5	5,51	0,02	0,03
118	@thedelegator	442	9	6	44,89	0,16	0,03
119	@titusfrost	34	15	97	27,44	0,09	0,03
120	@englishtchrivy	65	18	61	25,36	0,09	0,03
121	@papa-pepper	28	24	84	15,84	0,05	0,03
122	@meesterboom	159	58	2	8,48	0,03	0,03
123	@canadian-coconut	51	20	1	23,78	0,08	0,03
124	@lyndsaybowes	176	81	9	5,54	0,02	0,03
125	@bitbulls	76	44	99	8,76	0,03	0,03
126	@broncnutz	83	58	1	7,45	0,03	0,03
127	@daviddivergent	119	27	49	18,13	0,06	0,03
128	@aguia	61	2	100	188,73	0,65	0,03
129	@lotto-austria	224	78	17	5,87	0,02	0,03
130	@communitycoin	108	26	56	16,88	0,06	0,03
131	@tobixen	38	31	61	12,75	0,04	0,03
132	@maygor	96	63	100	6,91	0,02	0,03
133	@v4vapid	33	30	1	13,92	0,05	0,03
134	@steemyoda	35	11	38	38,75	0,13	0,03
135	@blewitt	120	53	26	7,81	0,03	0,03
136	@empato365	50	20	97	21,43	0,07	0,03
137	@mmmmkkkk311	33	22	12	19,5	0,07	0,03
138	@ipromote	597	2	2	205,06	0,71	0,03
139	@noaommerrr	94	2	100	212,75	0,74	0,03
140	@reiseamateur	160	85	16	4,87	0,02	0,03
141	@talanhorne	55	39	50	12,12	0,04	0,03
142	@falconcash	48	2	100	246,93	0,85	0,03
143	@ericvancewalton	36	29	91	11,75	0,04	0,02
144	@louisthomas	48	29	55	8,92	0,03	0,02
145	@quinneaker	58	7	33	47,85	0,17	0,02
146	@upyourpost	64	16	44	17,26	0,06	0,02
147	@richq11	98	50	14	5,15	0,02	0,02
148	@lordjames	51	36	40	7,56	0,03	0,02
149	@nanzo-scoop	15	4	75	65,36	0,23	0,02
150	@vikisecrets	68	36	16	7,47	0,03	0,02
151	@neoxian	74	45	3	7,53	0,03	0,02
152	@goldvault	62	6	85	43,25	0,15	0,02
153	@steemed-proxy	4	2	100	170,83	0,59	0,02
154	@roxane	138	82	1	3,02	0,01	0,02
155	@riosparada	40	7	100	42,47	0,15	0,02
156	@steemmatt	194	37	26	7,99	0,03	0,02
157	@bullionstackers	26	17	39	14,55	0,05	0,02
158	@trumpman	101	61	6	5,36	0,02	0,02
159	@ksc	37	36	100	8,21	0,03	0,02
160	@talentclub	26	13	32	18,18	0,06	0,02
161	@steemitpoetry	86	31	61	9,65	0,03	0,02
162	@fatkat	131	5	100	47,02	0,16	0,02
163	@coruscate	101	60	11	5,97	0,02	0,02
164	@selfvotejustice	43	10	56	36,62	0,13	0,02
165	@freebornangel	183	72	20	3,33	0,01	0,02
166	@onceuponatime	49	35	1	9,65	0,03	0,02
167	@meno	147	92	18	3,17	0,01	0,02
168	@theaustrianguy	73	63	3	4,91	0,02	0,02
169	@granturismo	87	68	7	4,61	0,02	0,02
170	@tcpolymath	81	62	33	3,87	0,01	0,02
171	@try-market	8	8	62	40,07	0,14	0,02
172	@seoinseock	83	43	18	6,74	0,02	0,02
173	@leroy.linientreu	100	46	21	6,54	0,02	0,02
174	@watwrongwitunews	105	9	98	33,1	0,11	0,02
175	@rulesforrebels	125	73	51	4,65	0,02	0,02
176	@francisk	135	65	8	5,31	0,02	0,02
177	@retinox	43	21	53	12,18	0,04	0,02
178	@bitcoindollar	82	55	74	4,82	0,02	0,02
179	@saramiller	50	10	37	35,37	0,12	0,02
180	@kiefpreston.com	82	18	64	19,04	0,07	0,02
181	@levfevzi	50	7	69	49,48	0,17	0,02
182	@armentor	44	15	39	22,36	0,08	0,02
183	@armdown	55	43	16	5,9	0,02	0,02
184	@kafkanarchy84	103	64	11	4,4	0,02	0,02
185	@uwelang	74	36	8	7,94	0,03	0,02
186	@john-robert	76	26	85	12	0,04	0,02
187	@promote.helper	110	3	99	75,47	0,26	0,02
188	@darsico	71	18	46	20,48	0,07	0,02
189	@urso	55	2	100	157,91	0,55	0,02
190	@silver-hammer	30	11	16	21,95	0,08	0,02
191	@woolgom	82	49	58	6,47	0,02	0,02
192	@battleaxe	135	70	20	3,53	0,01	0,02
193	@everittdmickey	217	68	1	3,86	0,01	0,02
194	@bronevik	48	13	53	27,41	0,09	0,02
195	@freiheit50	56	39	40	5,85	0,02	0,02
196	@shivohum2015	53	7	91	26,26	0,09	0,01
197	@slobberchops	120	49	18	4,51	0,02	0,01
198	@technerd888	211	1	25	85,58	0,3	0,01
199	@doomsdaychassis	82	38	37	2,74	0,01	0,01
200	@mythologyupvote	47	17	52	7,38	0,03	0,01

---

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@emperorofnaps	88	19	14	302,9	1,05	0,39
2	@boomerang	19	11	9	79,14	0,27	0,06
3	@estabond	54	12	14	62,35	0,22	0,05
4	@thebot	48	10	39	79,5	0,27	0,05
5	@lrd	40	13	22	47,43	0,16	0,04
6	@brandonfrye	57	10	18	33,13	0,11	0,02

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.