Bitcoin Scaling

Bitcoin transactions have been slowing down lately, that’s because it is reaching its limit in terms of block size.

Block and block size

Cryptocurrencies and blockchains are essentially built out of blocks, which are a unit of information.

With the Bitcoin blockchain, each block has a limit of 1 MB. The blockchain is composed out of a series or “chain” of blocks, which make up the public ledger, a copy of which resides on all the Blockchain nodes. It’s an endless number of blocks being tied or chained to one another through a cryptographic hash.

A block consists of two parts: a header and a body. Within the block, there are different layers of data. The header stores a cryptographic hash of the previous block, along with a time signature and other data. The body stores the transactions, including sender data and receiver public keys, which help ensure that these are legitimate transactions.

The problem is that as transactions increase and become data-heavy, it clogs the blocks, which bogs down the network when demand is high. This becomes an increasing issue as more people start using Bitcoin and adopt the technology. In order for the Bitcoin to succeed and be useful, a solution to process the blocks faster is necessary.

This is called Bitcoin Scaling.

SegWit

One of the proposed code improvement protocols designed to solve the Blockchain size limitation is called SegWit.

Proposed by the Bitcoin Core development team in 2016, the SegWit protocol breaks the original block into two parts: the original block and an extended “witness” block. It removes the script or code from the transactions and puts it into an extended block, which creates more vacant space in the original block. The blocksize remains the same, but it can contain data more efficiently. Meanwhile, the witness segment is counted as a quarter of its original size.

SegWit is considered a “soft fork”, meaning it’s compatible with the old code, which also means it can be retroactively implemented on the entire Bitcoin Blockchain. It is different from a hard fork, wherein new code is not compatible with the existing Blockchain, thus creating another “currency” and a separate Blockchain (more on that later).

Lightning Network

SegWit laid the groundwork for a “Lightning Network”, where transactions are faster, cheaper, and more scalable. It also opens up payment channels that move transactions off the main blockchain, and some developers have already worked on this technology.

SegWit2x

Another proposal to address Blockchain limitations is SegWit2x, which segregates the witness data and also increases block sizes from 1 MB to 2 MB.

Well to start things off, SegWit2x will be a hard fork, meaning it will not be compatible with previous blocks (a.k.a. the entire existing Blockchain). Users will have to update their version to the latest protocol.

In other words, a hard fork is a permanent divergence from the previous/existing blockchain, and nodes running previous versions will have to update to the new one. This essentially means the emergence of a new blockchain.

To implement SegWit2x would need the absolute majority of miners to agree to fork, however, since it’s a very and radical change, which will require significant hardware and capability upgrade for nodes due to the blocksize increase.

The August Hard Fork (a.k.a. Bitcoin Cash)

Meanwhile, while these proposals were being put forward and tested, a group of major Bitcoin miners who previously supported the SegWit2x proposal decided that deploying SegWit without increasing the block size would not be sustainable, as it would simply delay the scaling issue due to the size limit.

The hard fork essentially increases the block size to 8 MB, and it also removes the SegWit code change that was targeted to be activated later in the month.

This new blockchain makes it easier to make a block.

What you need to understand

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer decentralized currency, and therefore transactions are a democratic “public agreement”.

When it was first launched, the founders and core developers probably did not expect adoption to scale at the level we are in now, and hence stuck with a 1 MB blocksize limit.

This particular limit has been a point of contention for years now, and it has resulted in so-called “civil wars” that have led to breakaway groups, like BitcoinUnlimited. The recent hard fork of Bitcoin Cash, however, still needs to prove its long-term viability.

Either way, whether you are an investor into cryptocurrencies, a user, a miner, or basically anyone with a stake in this industry and technology, the above are steps taken toward improving the security and reliability of the network.