Bitcoin is plagued with problems, that may eventually cause its downfall.
Bitcoin was the first crypto currency, which made it king. This does not mean its the best, far from it.
Bitcoin was first created in 2008 and was largely ignored. In the time leading up to its massive explosion the creator disappeared. All progress since then has come from the community forking the chain, and that is very rarely done. There are many problems with the currency that need to be addressed, and some that could prove fatal.
The Problem of Bitcoin's Blockchain Structure
Bitcoin strives to be free and secure.
This freedom is achieved through decentralized blockchain. Every computer hoping to spend bitcoin must have the entire blockchain downloaded. This transaction then propagates throughout the network until it is included in a block. This new block is then downloaded to all of the computers hoping to use the network and the process continues.
Blockchains of this type have two major problems: The transactions are hard capped, and the storage space required. The first is a problem of scalability. The network can not become more widespread and be considered the worldwide currency it strives to be when we have already up against the transaction limit. The only way to fix this without massive changes to bitcoin are increases in the maximum size of each block, which is still being heavily debated. A change in maximum block size would have a major effect on the second problem. The block size is already over 120 gigabytes. As the blockchain takes more time and resources to download, the more expensive it is to start mining and sending bitcoins. This leads to more and more centralization, the whole thing bitcoin was trying to avoid. [1]
Looking at this picture you can see the acceleration of the size of the blockchain.
Proof of Work
Bitcoin mining is the process in which bitcoin validates transactions. This runs with a process called Proof of Work, where computers race to find a singular hash which “solves” the block and allows it to propagate throughout a network. This race includes a massive amount of computers, which in turn causes a massive waste in humanities resources. [2]
The first mining was done with cpu’s. It was found that it was far less efficient than GPUs, and that multiple GPUs could easily operate on a single computer. This system can change algorithms easily when another becomes more profitable, so they are still commonly used today. (Although not for bitcoin mining) Next came the Field Programmable Gate Array, which consumed far less power than a GPU, but was just as fast and more expensive. Both of these were soon replaced by the Application Specific Integrated Circuit, known as ASIC. These ASICs were several orders of magnitude faster than GPU’s, but still consumed far less power. Unlike GPU’s these are produced by relatively few different companies. This leaves the entire network open to attacks by either the companies, or hackers if some way is found to attack the miners themselves. [3]
Then comes the problems of the amount of power Proof of Work consumes. The total hashpower of the bitcoin network is about 5.1 terahashes a second. The latest antminer (the most popular brand of ASIC) is rated at 0.098 J/GHs. This is the most efficient miner on the market. Crunching the numbers gives us 490 terawatts minimum. We all know that few people have the best miner, and using the older antminer s7 as a gauge gives us even worse results. (It is fair since it is still in production and was released only a year and a half ago.) This ASIC has an efficiency of 0.25 W/GH/s. This gives us an estimate of 1200 terawatts of power. The problems with this are twofold. This is both a major source of centralization and pollution of the environment. [4][5]
Bitcoin mining is becoming very centralized in China, in part because of extremely cheap electricity (about $0.08 usd kwh vs $0.12 on average in the US). This electricity is even cheaper in bulk. China controls 60% of the world’s hashrate, with about 80% of the daily transaction volume. [6][7]
The effect on the environment. On average each Kilowatt hour of energy causes 1.2 pounds (0.55 kg) of CO2 to be released. This is about 12.5 million pounds (587 thousand kg) of CO2, per year. Professionals say this go up by ten times by 2020. This doesn’t even factor in the impact of making, storing, and cooling mining hardware. There is over 10,000 metric tonnes of bitcoin mining hardware. That is enough material to build a new Eiffel tower. All of these resources are wasted to humanity, just because social change is too hard. The only value of bitcoin comes from the thought of it having value. [8][9][10]
Bitcoin was created for a few reasons, but because of the way they are carried out they can only exist naturally for so long. It has served its purpose and spawned a whole host of new currencies that cost humanity less resources to use.
This actually is an interesting article... well this a side libertarians (right-wing) have to consider when it comes to bitcoins.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree Bitcoin does has its flaws, but what crypto do you think would take its spot? Also with concern regarding scalability, what happens if bitcoin adopts SigWit? It will be able to scale their transferability sizes and the amount of time a transaction takes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If segwit just increases the block size and decreases the time, the size of the blockchain will start increasing. This will still lead to more centralization
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If Bitcoin adopts Segwit the functionality would change from top to bottom. It would need to be a slow integration to assure a smooth transition. But HEY if Segwit can pull it off it would keep Bitcoin decentralized - which is what we all want....right?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thanks.. goodjob
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good read. I don't know much about Bitcoin's history or anything really but it's interesting to read things like this
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks, bitcoin doesn't have much history yet to really know about so you're fine lol
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Absolutely, The bitcoin revolution is about to begin.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
revision*
its not a revolution
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i think, this is a financial revolution. bitcoin was not here 15years ago and was not that popular neither in the last couple of years.
it is now that people will begin to use it as an every day currency. this will have a huge economic impact on the monetary system around the globe all along with other promising cryptocurrencies like dash and monero.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
its still the same system in the end though. It won't change where our resources come from, it won't change who the richest people are (other than making a few millionaires), it won't change who is starving right now and why. All it changes is how capital moves.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you're talking from a purely communistic point of view. i respect that, but why would banks charge a straving worker 50$ for transfering 100$ across the border to a starving son.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"why would banks charge a straving worker 50$ for transfering 100$ across the border to a starving son."
profit and to keep the working class there living in wage slavery.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post received a 3.0% upvote from @randowhale thanks to @anarchyhasnogods! For more information, click here!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good post. I appreciate you pointing out the issues with energy consumption and environmental impact. Other coins, like #Gridcoin, use meaningful work that benefits scientific research for mining. Check my posts or #BOINC for more info!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @anarchyhasnogods! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Award for the number of comments
Award for the number of comments received
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honnor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Despite of bitcoin problems it will be adopted by masses in near future.
In fact it is happening now. I have seen a community of online earners have adopted bitcoin and crypto trading in last 2 months.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Bitcoin is just the beginning, there are many other cryptos which i believe has the potential to build a future. Thanks for sharing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A good article, and really 'to-the-point' re: bitcoin's vulnerabilities. Hmmmm... China controls 60% of the hardware processing.... and we are questioning the recent instability in pricing for bitcoint & other crypto-currencies...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice blog. I was about to post a similair post. The decision to buy a coin should be based on real analysis of the coin. I found that people keep buying coins without have any knowledge of them. This is considered high risk. Does anyone know about: https://www.coincheckup.com I'm really happy with this site that gives complete coin analysis for every single crypto. See: https://www.coincheckup.com/coins/Bitcoin#analysis To check Bitcoin Detailed report
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit