RE: Bitcoin (BTC) Evening Update: Price is Sitting on Lower Bollinger Band & Upper Trend Line Support

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Bitcoin (BTC) Evening Update: Price is Sitting on Lower Bollinger Band & Upper Trend Line Support

in bitcoin •  7 years ago  (edited)

Thanks for the update Haejin; I've been calmly expecting some turbulence around this support line for over a month as the IHS was apparent. This seems like healthy consolidation from weak hands -> people like you and other strong hands. Keep up the good work :)


Some potential patterns forming:
(Rare Reversal Pattern; Ascending 90 Triangle)


Bear Flag (Continuation of downtrend)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Isn't an ascending 90° triangle bearish as well? The daily chart looks openly bearish to me. The last uptrend through February looks like a finished B from a Zigzag.
This would mean we go up till max 10600 a last time and then down for wave 3 of C. I hope I am wrong though :D

Ascending 90°'s are generally continuation patterns associated with up-trends; but in rare occasions form at the bottom of a downtrend in the form of a reversal.

It's definitely a time to be attentive to price action.

Cool info! Where do you start counting for the Ascending 90?

I figure you're referring to this formation:

If you're concerned about this ABC try counting subwaves.

No, I am concerned the long term correction is not through.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Also your wave 1 placement (subwaves of A) is erroneous because of the wick that goes much lower than your wave 4 (Invalidates your count)

Wave C should be longer (x2) of wave A which would put BTC below 0 USD. If that's your primary I'd be concerned as well :P

I never heard of this x2-rule before. Certainly ZigZags are usually stronger corrections than what I drew here. But the only rules I knew so far is that C has to close below A and B is never higher than 61.8% of A. But yeah the subwaves for A are wrong, I missed the thin line from 22/12.

Btw I hope you did not get my replies wrong. I don't want to "know it better", I am just eager to learn and understand this better.