The one who write that article is either dumb or don't bother research. There're some mistakes or things that i don't like such as :
- Bitcoin isn't anonymous, but only pseudonymous because the ledger is public and everyone can see it which means it's traceable.
- Who would forget their things which are valuable.
- There's no thing such as Bitcoin account or connect bitcoin to bank account directly.
- He don't know if bitcoin fraction can be increased by adding more zero after period (.)
- I think he blame bitcoin because he use crappy centralized wallet/service.
I think he's not only against bitcoin, but also don't bother do research or even understand what he's doing.
Thanks for the response, I couldn't agree more! Viva la bitcoin!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit