RE: Seg-Wit Is A Trojan Horse - Bitcoin Scaling Debate Explained

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Seg-Wit Is A Trojan Horse - Bitcoin Scaling Debate Explained

in bitcoin •  8 years ago 

Then why did he specifically suggest that we do so?

He limited the block size to 1mb in 2010 and knew fully well that a hard-fork will be needed to change it.

This is not true. SegWit itself claims that it enables "off-chain transactions". Those violate the definition of Bitcoin. SegWit is not compatible with Bitcoin by definition.

It enables it. You don't have to use it and can continue doing all your transactions on the blockchain.

bitcoin
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    1
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    Note Satoshi's quote about it being fine to switch to client-only mode and have the nodes "on a server farm". The real Satoshi made exactly the same argument that Craig Wright made last weekend. Hmmm...

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00