Moore's law says otherwise. Bigger blocks is a long term exponential scaling solution.
RE: Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that lead to Bitcoin's original success, and Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that will lead to Bitcoin's future success.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that lead to Bitcoin's original success, and Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that will lead to Bitcoin's future success.
Its not all about Moores law.. Dont make sense anymore in future.
BlockChain blocks aren't transistors
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's completely irrelevant.
Besides, Mores Law is used more as a euphemism for rapid technological innovation. Even if Mores Law is broken, that doesn't necessarily mean much in the long run.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you think for a minute, you realize that it cant precisely double each year⚠️
its a stupid law these times.
do they want to double blocksize each year❓🤣
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think you need to revisit my above comment.
The blocksize can be any necessary. We might find better ways to scale in the future, who knows. LN for example is a great experiment, but unfortunately doesn't qualify yet.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree that it is a very good experiment.
They should coexist.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Once LN or another solution works well enough, we might not need to scale further or as fast on chain. But currently on chain 0-conf transactions on Bitcoin Cash are clearly superior.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit