Bitcoin Cash: Who Supports the Fork And Who Doesn't

The bitcoin blockchain may be just hours away from its first major fork.

While the technical maneuver (explained in more detail here) doesn't impact bitcoin itself, if implemented it will result in the creation of a competing cryptocurrency, Bitcoin Cash, with a similar transaction history.

That said, Bitcoin Cash intends to activate new rules that are at odds with the bitcoin network, aiming to boost transaction capacity by increasing the block size to 8MB and removing Segregated Witness (SegWit), a long-debated code optimization that's likely to activate on bitcoin later in August.

Warranted or not, some have been making a pretty big deal out of Bitcoin Cash's launch.

But, just like every other cryptocurrency, the success of Bitcoin Cash hinges on how much support it gets from users, businesses and miners. And, so far, it might not have much.

While it certainly has passionate supporters who disagree with bitcoin's technical direction, Bitcoin Cash is trading at about one-tenth of bitcoin's price on an available futures market.

And, so far, out of more than 20 mining pools, only one, ViaBTC, has said that it is giving miners that are a part of the pool the option of pointing their computing power toward the securing the cryptocurrency.

Elsewhere, it seems positions on and opinions of the project are still developing in real time.

Bitcoin Cash supporters

So, what do we know about supporters so far?

For one, Bitcoin Cash supporters often overlap with the members of bitcoin's scaling debate who have historically supported a bigger block size parameter.

Take for instance Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic, and Bitcoin Unlimited: a few alternative bitcoin softwares that tried to enact similar changes but never got off the ground. Many of the developers who worked on those projects now support Bitcoin Cash. In fact, some are working on compatible software implementations.

Then there are various entrepreneurs, researchers and users who support the ideas behind it.

"SegWit doesn't solve the problem we have right now which is an urgent need for on-chain scaling," said Yours CEO Ryan X. Charles, who supports Bitcoin Cash's technical roadmap.

Like Charles, some companies and users are backing the idea because they just want bitcoin to be easier and cheaper to use. They argue that an immediate block size parameter increase would go a long way toward achieving that.

"As far as how many support it, I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure the silent majority wants lower fees," he added.

The average fee for a transaction, at time of publication, was more than a dollar, down from nearly $5 last quarter.

#Bitcoin Cash vs. Segwit2x

Still, since Bitcoin Cash is trying to push a niche combination of scaling technologies, even some who support a bigger block size don't back the effort.

ShapeShift CEO Erik Voorhees is one, and DCG founder and CEO Barry Silbert, who played a big part in coordinating a technical roadmap called Segwit2x, is another.

That's partly because many companies and mining pools still intend to support the Segwit2x "agreement," another controversial scaling proposal that attracted the support of bigger bitcoin startups and mining pools representing 80% of the network’s computing power.

The obvious difference between Segwit2x and Bitcoin Cash is that Segwit2x doesn't intend to drop support for SegWit.

In this light, some see Bitcoin Cash as a possible backup plan if Segwit2x goes awry before the block size parameter increase expected in three months. (Although, that particular hard fork is quite controversial as well.)

While aligned with ViaBTC, one of Bitcoin Cash's biggest supporters, on some other issues, mining pool Bitcoin.com and mining firm Bitmain both also said they will continue to stand behind Segwit2x for the time being.

In that way, Bitcoin Cash might attract more support in the future if the Segwit2x scaling proposal fails to boost the block size parameter.