Litecoin Creator Claims on Twitter China Bitcoin Exchange Ban is For Real, Citing Anonymous Source

in bitcoin •  7 years ago  (edited)

What do you make of these claims?

bitcoin_lee

Some users on Twitter have also accused Charlie Lee of shorting the market before releasing this rumor.

bitcoin-lee-2.png

Bitcoin sold off about 4 percent ($170) in just the past hour as a result of Lee's Tweets!

bitcoin-lee-tweet.png

UPDATE: After getting ripped apart on Twitter, Charlie Lee deleted all of his Tweets pertaining to the Chinese exchange ban. This is his last message to his followers:

Charlie_tweets

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

oh haha i actually uploaded the same story as you. didn't see yours until after i posted

It happens sometimes. ;-)

How many times is the market gonna fall for the China news??? Seems like the same thing that happened a year or so ago when the saudis and the Russians kept claiming they're gonna cut oil production to boost prices. And every time the same news was recycled the market popped yet production kept increasing.

Sure sounds suspicious.

In other news I just picked up a little bit more BTC around $4100.

Even if the Chinese actually ban the exchanges, I don't think its going to be a big deal. Chinese volumes today are a much smaller chunk of daily global turnover than just a year ago. Plus, tech-savvy Chinese investors will still buy bitcoin via other venues like LocalBitcoins and other decentralized exchanges, so the only losers of such a ban will be the Chinese government's coffers.

news was posted way before LEEs tweet ,,, non issue..
NEXTTTTTT....

I know this is old new, but Charlie seems to be claiming that his anonymous source is legit. If it turns out that this is pure FUD, the hit to his reputation will be massive. This could also impact Litecoin quite a bit.

This post has received a 0.78 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.

This is not a matter of if anymore. Its when.

There's really no need for people to confirm or deny this, its clearly outlined in the People's bank of china press release of 4th of September:
http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/3374222/index.html

Just google translate point 3 and 4 if you can't understand Chinese .

In that release, the term "virtual currency" is used loosely to refer to ICOs, not the major cryptos.

I wish it was. While my chinese is not amazing, I did confirm with a native. There are 2 words referred to in the press release. One which effectively means "ICO coins" (代币) and the other that refers to the major cryptos like BTC and ETH "Virtual currency" (虚拟货币) and it mentions that both should seize being traded in exchanges for legal money.

Interesting. From all the interpretations I have read so far, it seems that the statement was very vague to begin with, and many people have come to the conclusion that the PboC was using the two terms interchangeably.

I think these interpretations come mostly from people who really want to believe otherwise...

There are examples there if you look for them. The best I can think of is Yunbi: https://yunbi.com/ . You will notice they are warning users about the regulations and have disabled RMB deposits. This is a pretty notable.

From Caixin that first reported the last BTC exchange regulation to the numerous extra sources, Charlee here and Wallstreet journal.... forbes, people are covering their eyes and ears and calling "fake news" a very legitimate concern. I've wanted to do a roundup of all the evidences but at this point, nothing will convince people until exchanges become restricted and ETH-BTC-LTC tanks.

I get what you're trying to say, but the issue with the WSJ article is that the author was using anonymous sources and very dubious statements like "people say," which reeks of bad journalism.

As for Yunbi, they prob got spooked by all the supposed "leaks" and decided to halt half deposits just in case.

All of the Chinese exchange has said that no official notices have been given, so at this point, there simply isn't any evidence, just rumors.

So here we are and its true. BTCC is shutting down. Journalism is not just taking an official source and re stating it. Journalism comes also in the form of anonymous tips, here-say etc. You could come up with all sorts of reasons why it might not be happening. But to deny that its a great possibility is what i'm seeing and that's utter nonsense.

I showed you an official source from People's bank of china saying exchanges need to stop and yunbi does just that and you say it's spooked?

All the major exchanges release the exact same statement preparing their users for the worst and that's still not enough?

You make a compelling argument, but if the PBoC really wanted all trading to cease, they would have issued official orders to every single exchange in mainland China. This would have been made very clear and there would have been no wiggle room.

I have a felling that the PBoC knows something fishy is going on at Chinese exchanges, and that earlier statement on ICOs was a warning shot to all exchanges to get them to fix their shit.

The fact that the big exchanges have not received official notices from the PboC is very telling!

Also, are you aware of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6vadb8/chinas_two_biggest_bitcoin_exchanges_huobi_and/