RE: Senate Banking Committee Holds Hearing on Crypto - Oct. 11, 2018

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Senate Banking Committee Holds Hearing on Crypto - Oct. 11, 2018

in bitcoin •  6 years ago 

edited my post before seeing your response.

Check out https://steemit.com/spam/@steem.organic/test
Coming soon...

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

That is really a cool tool!

That's a nice little gadget but it seems to be overlooking "smart market/steem" purchased votes on the most recent update.

I though we had most of those, Still digging more. If you have an easy way to detect them let me know.

Maybe I'm confused. Test one is recent, I looked at test two. Looked at test two again and this time I noticed the date at the bottom. The first time I looked I thought test two was up to date. Test one looks to be accurate.

Is the curation portion deducted from those numbers?

no curation is not removed, test 2 is just for editing purposes, the self-updaint post is currently the one from 19days ago.

Not an "easy" way but not impossible if you're looking at individual posts rather than large volumes.

https://busy.org/@crokkon/what-is-the-reward-pool-share-of-vote-sellers-bid-bots-and-autovotes-1535479520399

The signatures of blockchain vote transactions can reveal who initiated the vote on behalf of the users. As a positive side effect: the same method also reveals autovotes via steemauto or steemdunk. The downside is: this approach is much more compute intensive and therefore slower than the bot list approach. Analyzing larger time ranges is costly.

That's we were already using this to automate the tool.

  ·  6 years ago Reveal Comment

Nice post! Really usable.