RE: Pros and cons of two versions of Steem Proposal System

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Pros and cons of two versions of Steem Proposal System

in blocktrades •  6 years ago  (edited)

I think we could consider moving to it if and when the funding/budget system is proven, including shown itself able to fund a variety of useful value-add for Steem. Once that is demonstrated then it makes a lot of sense to look at social rewards in such a context.

Applying it to witness rewards is more problematic because of the circularity/bootstrapping problem. Without reliable witnesses you don't have a secure blockchain on which to conduct the voting or operate the budget system. Some blockchain projects have and are proposing to allow the substructure to be mutated by stakeholder vote, and this could be okay, but it is far more complex and riskier.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I think that's a great idea! And agree that transitioning to it after the WP system is proven would be a good decision.

Posted using Steeve, an AI-powered Steem interface