Western Media has barely said anything about the persecution of Falun Gong since the late 1990s, if they wanted to use Falun Gong to weaken Chinese authority in China, then Western Media and Western politicians would be pushing it way more aggressively than they are now.
How did I use "allegiance" in a dirty way?
I will admit the West is not perfect, but China is not the paragon of human rights. From working on a social credit system that will prevent people from doing their daily activities based on the good or evil actions based on the CCP, to illegally harvesting organs from executed criminals, China is not exactly interested in the rights of individuals, they only care about beating the West, the U.S specifically by any means necessary.
RE: Religious Persecution: Falun Gong
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Religious Persecution: Falun Gong
they wouldn't need to as it was design or used as a chinese domestic operation against ccp. what could they do now? they tried in the 90's believed to be able to take over the information war, were buffed, and now it's full on AI + exponential sensors keeping track on every move that foreign agents could do and their only hope is to be able to have funerals in their homeland.
the ccp like human creation isn't perfection, but what would china be without it? I can't fanthom the level of destitution that the foreigners would have imposed on it, and forget anything ancient china, it would be hell. As long as you don't realize that the foreigners are still (or have lost hope) at war with china as an independent 100% sovereign force, and that the CCP as a hole is the only thing standing between the fall and liberty, as such you used the allegiance as a derogatory term, while this "alliegance" or cohesion or national unity is the only way to operate in a battlefield.
what are human rights? the scs permit the detection and elimination of ALL foreign agents trying to sow the seed of destruction inside china, do you prefer the epstein way? In china, esptein and 100% of his associates would have been executed, royals, kings or what ever they pretend to call themselves too, and if their executions can improve the lives of others, so be it. let's look at the means... for thousands of years, all nations, around China, knew and respected, then a little bit of transition and the failing in it, lead to them to believe they could seize and expand... then they only have themselves to pity.
that's the point, right now, individual rights, would be detrimental to the collective, there is a time for party and a time for war. right now it's still war.
A good example is the philipines... what the fuck are they pretending on those islands... for so many centuries they would have never even dared, and it would have been peaceful... and their is a price for population expansion, in term of organization and the forces that will be met in the process.
anyway... at least CCP is clear and straight. No bullshit, even myself, I guess, I have an idea of what is LEGAL and what is FORBIDDEN. and what is LEGAL isn't forbidden by vicious and stealthy means.
about democratic rights, the people of catalunia? the people of england? assange... yeah... narratives...
Shanghai CBD won, Manhattan is angry, then Shanghai goes to Beijing, Manhattan will experience fear and death. if you think there is no scs in the west you dream...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit